"You seemed to take the bait that the government could stop to blood related people from getting married/having kids because it would somehow intrude on your rights." Your reading comprehension skills are about those of a ten year-old, I said that it would impact the rights of a yet-to-be-born issue from that marriage.
You on the other hand, are arguing that homosexual marriages somehow intrude upon your rights, but fail to explain how so.
Do 2 "parents" (actually one birth mother and one lesbian lover) shopping for a deaf male sperm provider to create a deaf baby impact the rights of that child? They sought to insure the likelihood of a deaf child.
The government played no role in that relationship.
I cite real world cases. You spin.