Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Luis Gonzalez
But minors under the of "age of consent" DO consent to have sex and there is no prosecution for it.

You say that they cannot legally consent but the law in today's permissive society does permit a certain level of sexual activity (bounded only by the age of the partner although it is not set in stone). Adults (over 18) are permitted to have sex with "consenting" minors even below a legal "age of consent" of 16.

Either minors can have sex legally or they can't. Is sex with an 18 year old "better" for that 14 year old better for her/him than sex with a 21 year old?

144 posted on 12/09/2003 12:56:51 AM PST by weegee (No blood for ratings! This means YOU AOL-Time-Warner-Turner-CNN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: weegee
We are discussing marriage here, the ability to legally enter into a binding contract.

Then again, thanks for yet one more example proving that "society" has no interest in preserving the institution of marriage.
165 posted on 12/09/2003 6:17:26 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez (The Gift Is To See The Trout.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson