Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Half of small firms want to ditch Windows for Linux
http://www.silicon.com/software/os/0,39024651,39117247,00.htm ^ | December 08 2003 | Munir Kotadia

Posted on 12/08/2003 4:08:15 PM PST by NCjim

Bad day at the Office for Microsoft...

One in four small companies are testing Linux, and half of them hope to use it as their core operating system in place of Windows, according to a survey by IBM.

The companies surveyed believe the open-source operating system will not only save them money, but will be more secure, stable and flexible.

However, the move away from Microsoft is also being assessed by both medium-sized and large organisations.

Microsoft has enjoyed absolute dominance in the desktop market for more than two decades, but there are signs that the company's stranglehold may have peaked, as both small and large organisations seriously consider alternatives. Windows is not the only loser in this evolution, as Unix and other platforms, such as Novell Netware, also face being replaced.

Unsurprisingly, smaller companies find it easer to adapt to new platforms and have been among the first to embrace Linux because they have a relatively simple migration path and can realise any benefits very quickly. TTS, a UK-based shipping company, has just twelve employees and recently began moving its systems to SuSE.

Dougie Bryce, TTS's director, said the company had grown dramatically over the past few years and needed to upgrade some systems to keep better track of freight. He said TTS decided to use Linux with IBM xSeries servers because it was a more flexible and efficient combination.

"Linux frees us from being tied to a single hardware or software vendor and helps us reduce costs. We can adapt our IT systems to suit our freighting business requirements as needed. Without such a move there is no doubt we could not have coped as efficiently with our growth," he said.

Research group IDC said last week that between July and September 2003, there was a 16 per cent rise in Linux server shipments in terms of spending, and a 32 per cent increase in terms of units. This compares to a 5 per cent increase in spending on Windows and a 26 per cent increase in Windows units. The figures indicate significant discounting of the Microsoft products.

The survey published by IBM claims that one in four companies with between 100 and 1,000 employees is currently using Linux, and half of them are expecting it to become their core operating system. However, a time frame for migration was not given.

Nick Davis, Linux x-Series sales manager at IBM, told ZDNet UK that the small business market used to be very concerned about switching to Linux, but with more support from large software vendors and hardware manufacturers, they have become more willing to take a chance:

"Applications from the likes of SAP, Sage and Peoplesoft are coming out for Linux, so there is a lot more confidence now."

Davis said that Hill House Hammond, an insurance broker with more than 200 retail outlets in the UK, was one of the UK's first medium-sized companies to make the move to Linux, and has since enjoyed significant cost savings.

"Under the old regime, they had one technical person for every 50 employees because they needed someone in each of their shops to do the administration, reboot the servers etc. etc. Now, they have one technical person for every 500 employees," he said.

Davis explained that although experienced Linux engineers may be more expensive than their Microsoft counterparts, companies that switch over to Linux don't need as many. "Their time is spent developing applications and moving the business forward rather than maintaining, supporting and keeping the old system up and running," he said.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: linux
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 12/08/2003 4:08:16 PM PST by NCjim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rdb3
Ping
2 posted on 12/08/2003 4:08:37 PM PST by NCjim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim
Still waiting on my security patches and scrollbar fixes for IE...

Oh, wait, Microsoft says they're not going to release any patches this month. I guess all those unpatched vulnerabilities and bugs are figments of our collective imaginations. So much for Gates' claim that they only take 24 hours to issue patches.
3 posted on 12/08/2003 4:17:20 PM PST by sigSEGV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim
Sounds like a lot of companies are sick of paying a mint for buggy software whose technical support people are snotty, expensive, and just about worthless.
4 posted on 12/08/2003 4:17:25 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (All the good tag lines are taken......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim
Half of small firms want to ditch Windows for Linux

I believe this headline is deceptive. It implies that half of all small firms "want to ditch Windows". Then the first paragraph says:

One in four small companies are testing Linux, and half of them hope to use it as their core operating system in place of Windows, according to a survey by IBM. (emphasis added)

Linux proponents should not need to be deceptive to generate interest. Linux is currently the best alternative to Microsoft, and though I'm a Microsoft user and expect that to continue, I like it when Microsoft has competition. It makes them sharper and more responsive. But Linux will not grow to be an effective competitor by having its supporters, as they sometimes do, exaggerate or deceive to get people to use it.

5 posted on 12/08/2003 4:27:41 PM PST by Joe Bonforte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim
"Linux frees us from being tied to a single hardware or software vendor and helps us reduce costs. We can adapt our IT systems to suit our freighting business requirements as needed. Without such a move there is no doubt we could not have coped as efficiently with our growth," he said.

A single hardware vendor? For a company with 12 people? Come on. I'm about as pro-linux as you can get, but this guy seems to be mouthing something he heard in the trade papers.
6 posted on 12/08/2003 4:41:04 PM PST by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim
One in four small companies are testing Linux, and half of them hope to use it as their core operating system in place of Windows, according to a survey by IBM.

LMFAO! Thanks for the advertising puff piece. IBM should pay FR for advertising!
7 posted on 12/08/2003 4:41:55 PM PST by Bush2000 (r>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim
You might want to mention that silicon.com is an overseas website, where anti-Microsoft and anti-American sentiments typically rule the day.
8 posted on 12/08/2003 4:49:53 PM PST by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
I'm shocked, shocked, shocked that IBM would find customers that want to move to Linux... /SARCASM
9 posted on 12/08/2003 4:52:36 PM PST by Bush2000 (r>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NCjim
There is no way on God's green earth that "small" firms have the sys admins to run Linux.
10 posted on 12/08/2003 4:57:33 PM PST by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim
This article sounds like so much eyewash to me. First Apple, and then Linux have been claiming that everyone was going to dump Microsoft for years, but somehow it never happens.

There are problems and costs with any operating system. I think Windows XP works very nicely.
11 posted on 12/08/2003 4:59:27 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
The real story was this foreign website tried to pose 12.5% of IBM's supposed sample as 50% of all small businesses. 50% of small businesses have never even heard of Linux...
12 posted on 12/08/2003 5:10:50 PM PST by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Drango
I must disagree with you - I know several small firms (less than 100 people) who use Linux. True, it is not the desktop of choice, but for mail servers, web servers and other "utility" servers, there are a lot of small firms that are using Linux.
13 posted on 12/08/2003 5:36:50 PM PST by taxcontrol (People are entitled to their opinion - no matter how wrong it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sigSEGV
Get the latest mozilla. Stops popups, annoying javascript, gratuitous cookies, and banner ads. It may suck having two browsers on Windows, but on Windows it's typical to have two (or more) of everything, including identical files.
14 posted on 12/08/2003 5:50:05 PM PST by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
XP is a major improvement over 98/ME/etc. If they organized their file system, embraced better (ie Unix/Linux) standards, made features/services easier to disable, retired more DOS-era crap (including "/r/n" text files and fdisk partitioning), and made their OS interoperate with the other ones out there, I figure far fewer hackers would hate them.
15 posted on 12/08/2003 5:56:29 PM PST by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lelio
A single hardware vendor? For a company with 12 people? Come on. I'm about as pro-linux as you can get, but this guy seems to be mouthing something he heard in the trade papers.

When I read that, I think I interpreted it different than you. I don't believe he means a single vendor now -- with 12 people, that's pretty easy. But, using Linux means that he wouldn't be locked into a single hardware or software vendor for future upgrades or growth.

16 posted on 12/08/2003 9:26:03 PM PST by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Drango
I worked at a small firm that had sys admins to run Linux. It was actually much more efficient once the network was switched from MS to Linux, so the sys admins could concentrate more of their time on streamlining the system rather than constantly maintaining and rebooting. The only MS server that was kept was Exchange, due to the need of the execs and sales to use Outlook. (Of course we could have switched email solutions, but sometimes it's easier to let people work with what they know rather than retrain them, especially if they're not tech-savvy.)
17 posted on 12/10/2003 6:03:25 AM PST by krinklyfig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: krinklyfig
That is the distinction. Sys admining work-effort-levels are comparable in both systems. Unix and MS, systems (Only mainframers are efficient!)

But in Unix based systems, the ineffeciencies are more internally driven by measure of ratio internal to extrenal. That internal nature means they MAY be connected to producitivity and marketing improvements. Or they may not -- unix is more prone to make-workism, prettying, feeding one's individual proclivities that are unrelated to actual production gains.

MS doesn't suffer the same indulgences -- because they are driving you so hard externally, you can't afford to be far off the mark from common practise.

IOW, Unix admin can be efficient, a business force multiplier. Or it can be a money hole full of flakes and quikry jerks. MS can't be the force multplier that Unix can, but the heavy external forcing function drives the operational staff into regular and predictable habits and dispositions.

The world of Unix administration would be greatly improved if the unix mavens began adapting the very effective work and management habits of mainframers.

18 posted on 12/10/2003 6:16:49 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: krinklyfig; taxcontrol
I'm sure some small firms use linux. But bottom line is that first you need to learn the MS "stuff" and then learn linux. Tuff to do in todays cramped work life.

I like linux, but I can't find the time to learn and apply it to the 2 servers and 200 desktops I support.

19 posted on 12/10/2003 6:18:56 AM PST by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
LMFAO! Thanks for the advertising puff piece. IBM should pay FR for advertising!

When I said the same thing about Microsoft's puff piece in Tech Central Station, your response was to tell me to prove it or shut up. You even stayed in denial after I proved it. I suppose I could do the same thing here, but I won't.

'lelio' is right, what that guy said came right out of the pen of an IBM PR flack; nobody talks like that. They stuck that under his nose and told him his company would get ten minutes of fame if he signed on.

This is a new thing for Microsoft. They are screwing with somebody their own size for a change. FUD will beget FUD, lawsuits will beget lawsuits. Sit back, grab some popcorn, and watch the show. This could be fun.

20 posted on 12/10/2003 6:37:38 AM PST by Nick Danger (With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson