Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: snopercod
Yeah I like the way that seniors always get the break at the expense of the working. Seniors get back far more in social security then they ever paid in while young people working today to pay for it will probably not receive a dime. This so called benefit is not free. The younger folks who receive no benefit from this are the ones who have to pay for it. So what this does is make it even harder for younger working folks to pay for there own prescription medicine. Recently there was a tax break that only went to those with children. A single young person in America today is really getting the life sucked out of them.
90 posted on 12/08/2003 5:43:20 PM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Revel
I have my mother's SS benefit statement. In her entire 30-year working career, she paid a grand total of $1023 into social security, and not a dime into Medicare.

Until she passed away recently, she received a total of around $150,000 in SS benefits, and a similar amount in Medicare benefits.

The numbers will be reversed for the rest of us.

This ponzi scheme would be illegal if you or I tried it.

93 posted on 12/08/2003 6:43:12 PM PST by snopercod (The federal government will spend $21,000 per household in 2003, up from $16,000 in 1999.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson