Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FirstPrinciple; RJCogburn; snopercod
You are not happy with Bush on the domestic front. He may not make the perfect domestic decisions to you. However, who will you vote for Dean or another independent candidate that can't win?
Bush is the only candidate to vote for. It's wise to vote for Bush for the security of our country.

Perot: Many tried to make a point to Bush senior and voted for Perot and that's what helped Clinton get elected. We have Perot voters to thank for that mess.
106 posted on 12/09/2003 3:47:22 AM PST by GodBlessUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: GodBlessUSA
I'm not sure whom I'll vote for, or if I'll even bother.

All I know is that W has taken America further and faster down the road to socialism than clinton ever did (see my tagline). He just saddled future generations with the biggest "entitlement" program since LBJ.

He has essentially nationalized the airline industry in America.

He has ignored his oath of office just as much or more than clinton did. The CFR bill he signed trampled the First Amendment, and the (misnamed) Patriot Act is busy trampling the Second, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, Ninth and Tenth.

But hey, look at the bright side. So far, anyway, we're safe from the threat of quartering soldiers in private homes.

You spoke of security. The security of America comes from the preparedness of it's informed, armed and vigilant citizens, not from an army of unionized drones at airports in a make-work program like the TSA.

The security of America comes from a vibrant economy - one with people who know how to acually design and build things, not just shuffle papers and manipulate symbols on a computer screen.

The masthead here at FR says "We're working to roll back decades of governmental largesse, to root out political fraud and corruption, and to champion causes which further conservatism in America."

Are we?

I'd say that selling oneself as a conservative then acting like a socialist when elected to office qualifies as fraud, wouldn't you? Why aren't we trying to root it out?

And notwithstanding his tax cut which is only temporary, please name one part of government largesse that has been "rolled back" under Bush. Why are we not outraged?

And please tell me how selling out the conservative base in America is "futhering the cause of conservatism"? I'm having a lot of difficulty understanding that one.

108 posted on 12/09/2003 5:15:11 AM PST by snopercod (The federal government will spend $21,000 per household in 2003, up from $16,000 in 1999.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

To: GodBlessUSA
We have Perot voters to thank for that mess.

No, we have the lip-synching fraud, George Herbert Walker Bush to thank for that mess.

111 posted on 12/09/2003 5:25:00 AM PST by RJCogburn ("Is that what they call grit in Fort Smith? We call it something else in Yell County." Mattie Ross)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

To: GodBlessUSA
No, we have only George HW Bush to blame for his defeat. He disregarded the reforms of the Reagan administration and raised taxes and gave us the monstrous ADA. He was rightly defeated. I will be voting Libertarian in 04. Anyone to the right of Bush will be just as good on security, if not better. At least we will be closing our porous border and stop playing goalie for the Saudis.
118 posted on 12/09/2003 9:25:40 AM PST by FirstPrinciple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson