1 posted on
12/08/2003 11:42:35 AM PST by
Phil V.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
To: Phil V.
Opinions of the u.n.or the hague are NOT RELEVANT!This action is clearly anti-semetic.
To: Phil V.
Courting Disaster in the New Age of InterNational Judicial Cooperation BumP
To: Phil V.
And why not? Going to court to achieve what you can't legally, seems to work well here. Maybe they can get China to tear down the Great Wall, or maybe even that pitiful partial fence we put on our southern border.
To bad they never questioned the Berlin Wall.
39 posted on
12/08/2003 3:46:39 PM PST by
itsahoot
(The lesser of two evils, is evil still...Alan Keyes)
To: SJackson; yonif; Simcha7; American in Israel; spectacularbid2003; Binyamin; Taiwan Bocks; ...
40 posted on
12/08/2003 4:30:00 PM PST by
Salem
(FREE REPUBLIC - Fighting to win within the Arena of the War of Ideas! So get in the fight!)
To: Phil V.
How about an "opinion" from the Court about Syria's 30-year illegal occupation of Lebanon, or Arafat's embezzeling $3 billion of UN, EU and US moneys into personal accounts, or the terror acts committed by the P.A. "security police" against Israeli civilians, or....
I know...I'm wasting my time. THEY AREN'T JEWS, so they DON'T COUNT.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
