Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cyborg
How is this case different from the 1980s Hustler v. Falwell, when the Supreme Court gave a blank check to Larry Flynt to libel the Reverend Falwell? At the time the liberal court said that because the Reverend Falwell was a "public figure" and because Flynt was using "satire" and "pardoy," there was no libel. So why is Mrs. Parks given priority over the Reverend Falwell?
30 posted on 12/08/2003 11:16:29 AM PST by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Theodore R.
pardoy

PARODY
56 posted on 12/08/2003 12:00:07 PM PST by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.
At the time the liberal court said that because the Reverend Falwell was a "public figure" and because Flynt was using "satire" and "parody," there was no libel. So why is Mrs. Parks given priority over the Reverend Falwell?

She won't. This case won't go anywhere... and for the very reason you mentioned above. Parks' lawyer will probably try to argue that she isn't a public figure now - but with a name that is so recognizable, I don't think they'll have a chance.
66 posted on 12/08/2003 12:19:26 PM PST by Stone Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson