Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MEGoody
Not at all. I would rather we have some real security by allowing law-abiding passengers to carry knives and handguns like we used to be able to do only a few years ago.

Let the terrorists try something then.

Strip searching little old ladies in wheelchairs and confiscating nail clippers does not enhance security. Neither does having some bull-dyke pat down women with underwire bras like they do now.

61 posted on 12/09/2003 8:59:58 AM PST by snopercod (The federal government will spend $21,000 per household in 2003, up from $16,000 in 1999.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: snopercod
"Not at all. I would rather we have some real security by allowing law-abiding passengers to carry knives and handguns like we used to be able to do only a few years ago."

A few years ago? When was this? I've been flying for many years, and I was never aware that anyone and everyone was allowed to carry weapons onto a plane.

How would the airline determine that the guy carrying the gun or knife is a law-abiding citizen? How would they determine that those who don't qualify as 'law-abiding citizens' (e.g. ex-cons or whatever your definition might be) aren't carrying weapons they are not supposed to have?

62 posted on 12/09/2003 9:11:31 AM PST by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson