Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Imagining "Imagine" : John Lennon's gibberish-filled anthem.
Daily Standard ^ | Joel Engel

Posted on 12/08/2003 7:44:45 AM PST by Hillary's Folly

Imagining "Imagine"
On the anniversary of John Lennon's death, it's worth taking a look at the gibberish in his beloved anthem.
by Joel Engel
12/08/2003 12:00:00 AM

 


 

Email a Friend

 

Respond to this article


TODAY MARKS the 23rd anniversary of John Lennon's murder by a deranged fan, an act that at once revivified the ex-Beatle's career and established his 1971 song "Imagine" as the official utopian anthem. For millions of people around the world, the song's three minutes of bumper-sticker slogans describe the best of all possible worlds.

But before the faithful gather in memoriam to light candles and sing "Imagine" together, as they always do on the anniversary, a few of them might want to stop and consider that the lyrics are hardly a recipe for universal bliss. Chaos may be closer to the truth.

Put aside for a moment the inconvenient fact that John once admitted he'd written "All You Need Is Love" as irony. Or that, as a Beatle, his most spirited vocals may have been on the group's cover of "Money (That's What I Want)," which begins: The best things in life are free / But you can keep them for the birds and bees. Or that, on his solo debut album, recorded a year before "Imagine," he sang: I told you before, stay away from my door / Don't give me that brother, brother, brother, brother . . . Let's just take the words of "Imagine" at face value.

Imagine there's no heaven . . . No hell below us . . . Imagine all the people living for today. Okay, let's imagine that; let's imagine six billion people who believe that flesh and blood is all there is; that once you shuffle

off this mortal coil, poof, you're history; that Hitler and Mother Teresa, for example, both met the same ultimate fate. Common sense suggests that such a world would produce a lot more Hitlers and a lot fewer Teresas, for the same reason that you get a lot more speeders / murderers / rapists / embezzlers when you eliminate laws, police, and punishment. Skeptics and atheists can say what they like about religion, but it's hard to deny that the fear of an afterlife where one will be judged has likely kept hundreds of millions from committing acts of aggression, if not outright horror. Nothing clears the conscience quite like a belief in eternal nothingness.

Imagine there's no countries . . . Nothing to kill or die for / No religion too / Imagine all the people / living life in peace. Hmmm. A single, borderless entity. No passports or customs inspectors rifling through your luggage. So far, so good. But wait a second. By what laws, rules, cultures, customs, and mores would we all be living? America's? Saudi Arabia's? Iceland's? Cuba's? Obviously, organizing billions of people from different traditions around a common mindset would require some serious coercion that progressives (many of whom will be out in force tonight with lighted candles) keep reminding us is not our prerogative--not even in countries with brutal dictators. And if there's nothing to kill or die for, then there's really nothing to live for, either--not equality, not liberty, not justice. It bears remembering that those young Englishmen who declared, in the 1930s, that they wouldn't fight for king and country did nothing for the cause of peace; quite the opposite. Lennon's own Oxford Pledge may warm the hearts of pacifists, but it's true music to a tyrant's ears.

Imagine no possessions, I wonder if you can / No need for greed or hunger, a brotherhood of man / Imagine all the people, sharing all the world. . . . Let's begin implementing the third stanza's message by splitting up the royalties to this copyrighted song. Mrs. Lennon, I imagine, will be only too happy to share with the rest of us the proceeds from the semiannual checks she receives for its licensing. In fact, why don't we all participate in every revenue stream created by John's invaluable catalogue? No, even that's not good enough. John wants us all to own everything, so we're each entitled to an equal share of not only his catalogue but also every album, tape, and CD ever made--by every artist. True, in such an egalitarian world, there soon won't be any record stores from which to take home recorded merchandise, since the owners will have nothing left to sell and are anyway no longer the owners (we all are). Nor will there be anything to play or record the music on (assuming any artist still wants to record), since there'd be no one to build the equipment. Why should anyone volunteer to work in a factory making hard goods when everyone else is living in the poshest houses and eating at the finest restaurants for free? Of course, housing and food are going to be problems, too, unless someone volunteers to mine the quarries, hammer nails, plant corn, and catch salmon for the rest of

us. In John's imagined world, su casa es mi casa. So is su radicchio.

And the world will live as one. One what? Violent mess, apparently.

Imagine that.

Joel Engel is an author and journalist in Southern California.



TOPICS: Editorial; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 241 next last
To: Hillary's Folly
Well, I happen to think it's a beautiful piece of music, and I view the song as an expression of a heartfelt longing for a better world and more spiritual people (and I'm sure Lennon would have included himself at the top of the list), not as a call for the Communist Manifesto. If you start taking song lyrics too literally and seriously you might as stop listening to music altogether.
101 posted on 12/08/2003 8:59:31 AM PST by blowfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts
Unfortunately, many interpret it literally.
102 posted on 12/08/2003 9:01:38 AM PST by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Skooz
Did anyone watch CSPAN this weekend, the Democratic National convention? They were playing Imagine and everyone there was swaying to the music. It was so classic. Liberals everywhere, dreaming of a perfect world with no religion to.


CD
103 posted on 12/08/2003 9:02:40 AM PST by Coffee_drinker (aint it great!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Skooz
I didn't say atheism; I said organized religion.
104 posted on 12/08/2003 9:03:15 AM PST by A Navy Vet (government is the problem, not the solution!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
While the author is right in the literal sense, I think he comes off as a bit anal to actually deconstruct the lyrics. 99% of the people listening to the song probably like the tune/sound and never give a second thought to what the lyrics actually mean. Articles like these are the reason conservatives are viewed as so ill-humored. JMO

Peace and love songs of the era. Does the author think someone actually wanted to "teach the world to sing in perfect harmony", or "hold it in my arms and keep it company", or even "buy the world a Coke'? LOL

105 posted on 12/08/2003 9:03:18 AM PST by Lijahsbubbe (Take my advice; I don't use it anyway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Taliesan
It's like listening to a song celebrating Aryan supremacy, and responding with "but it's got a really snappy beat".

True, true. Every time I hear "Imagine" on the radio, I dissect the lyrics to my very conservative wife, and she kinda rolls her eyes at me for ruining a nice song. As much as I "like" the song, the lyrics do give me a problem, but mostly because they are real stupid. Now, if I thought people were really listening and believing all that cr*p, then I would be worried. But your point is well taken.

106 posted on 12/08/2003 9:04:02 AM PST by Paradox (Cogito ergo boom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet
huh?
107 posted on 12/08/2003 9:05:47 AM PST by Skooz (We keep you alive to serve this ship. Row well, and live.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Coffee_drinker
Liberals everywhere, dreaming of a perfect world with no religion to. What a site that must have been. Ironically, they don't seem to understand that Liberalism IS a religion!
108 posted on 12/08/2003 9:06:03 AM PST by Paradox (Cogito ergo boom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: blowfish
expression of a heartfelt longing for a better world and more spiritual people

"and no religion too" ????

While I will agree that one can be religious without being spiritual, it would be awfully hard to be sprititual without being religious, according to the definition of Jesus' brother James : "Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world."

109 posted on 12/08/2003 9:06:17 AM PST by BSunday (I'm not the bad guy. Hillary is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Folly
The best you can say for it is that it's hippie schmaltz! No different from bopper schmaltz sung 10 years earlier by the likes of Bobby Vinton. And among that was at least one song, Blue on Blue, written by Burt Bacharach and the master lyricist Hal David. So there!
110 posted on 12/08/2003 9:07:19 AM PST by Revolting cat! (Merry Shopping Season and a Happy Pre-Christmas Storewide Sales Event!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BSunday
But I will disagree with you using Lennon/Lenin's own words:

Wellllll...it could be argued that the last two lines are a lament that there are so many closed minds that are unable to imagine or daydream.

111 posted on 12/08/2003 9:07:29 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (I have opinions of my own - strong opinions - but I don't always agree with them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
You said Mother Theresas, not good people. I do believe the overwhelming majority of people are good, but that doesn't make them Mother Theresa.
112 posted on 12/08/2003 9:08:16 AM PST by August West (To each according to his ability, from each according to his need...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Paradox
I agree, but you will never get a liberal to agree to that definition. To a liberal religion is basically the Christian religion.
113 posted on 12/08/2003 9:08:18 AM PST by Coffee_drinker (aint it great!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Skooz
Atheism with a capital "A" is a religion.
114 posted on 12/08/2003 9:09:45 AM PST by August West (To each according to his ability, from each according to his need...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

Comment #115 Removed by Moderator

To: Taliesan
This is what I ask people who argue that religion is the only thing that keeps society from falling into barbarism or anarchy.

If someone, somehow proved to you today that there was no god, would you run out tomorrow and rape your neighbor's wife, rob a bank and shoot a cop?

Imagine...
116 posted on 12/08/2003 9:10:12 AM PST by Trampled by Lambs (...and pecked by the dove...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts
Come on now...you are reaching and you know it. But you do have that right and it seems we will just have to disagree on it.
117 posted on 12/08/2003 9:10:52 AM PST by BSunday (I'm not the bad guy. Hillary is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Trampled by Lambs
Of course not.

But morality, based upon religious principles, is the foundation for law across the world. Always has been.
118 posted on 12/08/2003 9:12:08 AM PST by Skooz (We keep you alive to serve this ship. Row well, and live.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Paradox
Agreed. A point can be at the same time true and yet not critical enough to test a friendship over.

I personally can't enjoy the song because of the lyrics. But I generally don't argue about them. Except on FreeRepublic, of course -- where we argue about everything! :-)

Regards.

119 posted on 12/08/2003 9:12:41 AM PST by Taliesan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: August West
Animals do not murder or rape, they just do what animals do. I think it's our societal laws and mores that do more to keep humans in line, than religious beliefs.
120 posted on 12/08/2003 9:13:34 AM PST by stuartcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 241 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson