[whereasandsoforth]

But lets say it again and again....President Bush would not have been defeated in 1992 if Ross Perot had not been there to manipulate the election. There would never have been a President Clinton. Why do journalist continually fail to mention this? It is a large factor in history.

[DeFault User]

Though Mr Clinton may have been a liar and an adulterer, he was not a drug dealer or a murderer.

Are you certain, Mr. Anderson?

[cardinal4]

The magnetism of hatred is pulling the Democratic Party away from electability.

Good quote. I just hope its true..

[sr4402]

Most normal Americans do not want to hate their President and they resent those who try to incite them to do so.

I wish the press could figure this out. We don't like being condesended upon. I've had it with this sactimonious, preachy press.

This weekend, my wife and I went to see an IMAX movie on the Coral Reef and got preached to for over half the movies length on how to save the reef. I came out feeling a bit ill (just as I do after listening to liberal reporters) and I asked myself, why do I pay good money to get preach propaganda, when I want entertainment?

It would be good for the press to think about this for a while.

[Paradox]

This piece has some real insight, especially the part about how Americans DON'T WANT to hate the President. I can't tell you how many people I know who didn't like Clinton, but thought the hatred of him was just too much, and thus rallied around him (at the time). Today, those same people kind of cringe when I mention their vote for Clinton back when... This fanning of the flames of hatred is just a bad idea, I thought so back during Clinton, I think so today as well.

I think Dean is going to pull HARD to the center once he gets the nomination. I think that is his plan all along, he is just USING the rabid hatred on the left to get him over that major hump.

[mewzilla]

Though Mr Clinton may have been a liar and an adulterer, he was not a drug dealer or a murderer.

May have been? Was not?