To: Velveeta
Perhaps he was thinking in terms of fingerprints on the bucket--his fingerprints might be superimposed over Laci's, since he had been the last one to touch the bucket. And he may have wanted to explain that away even b/f the question was asked... ?
To: Devil_Anse
It could be the fingerprints on the bucket. Remember we all discussed how strange it was that SP offered up "bucket information" during his Diane Sawyer interview? Since LE had made a "big deal" out of the bucket by removing it from the house, he *offered* what he thought was a reasonable explanation for the freshly wet mop. It's just that none of his explanations about anything related to Laci's disappearance make any sense!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson