To: Sandylapper
If there is a slight foundation of fact that supports the introduction of evidence about this Carroll, or about other paid thugs, then maybe the defense can get it in. Otherwise, they will not be able to bring it up. They can't just throw any old thing into their questioning. There has to be a foundation laid--not only for the asking of questions on that subject, but also for the introduction of ANY evidence purporting to relate to Carroll, etc.
To: Devil_Anse; Velveeta; All
Yeah, I know, and thought I had made it clear that by virtue of the Oct. 28th NE article, I think there is a taped conversation (foundation) between Scott and Amber whereby MG can get his nose in that door. Of course, maybe my interpretation of the article is incorrect, but for now I'm sticking to it.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson