[Velveeta]

Thanks for finding it Sandy! I think this is what was misinterpreted because it's not well written:
_____________________
***NE says, as they have reported exclusively, Amber and Scott's "frequent phone conversations continued almost until April 18, when Scott was arrested."

It concludes by saying that "Amber had delighted her police handlers by extracting this taped confession from Scott: "I didn't do anything to Laci, but I know who did." And, briefly brings up the irony of Melvin King meeting with Cory Carroll, and talking with Amber.***
_______________________
The National Enquirer is just pointing out the irony that Melvin King had been the Private Investigator that Amber knew early on who was ready to polygraph SP if SP agreed in February.

The irony is that Melvin King was *also* the investigator called to polygraph Cory Carroll in October. It's *not* implied that Amber and Scott discussed Cory....

[Sandylapper]

It concludes by saying that "Amber had delighted her police handlers by extracting this taped confession from Scott: "I didn't do anything to Laci, but I know who did." And, briefly brings up the irony of Melvin King meeting with Cory Carroll, and talking with Amber.

Vel, this was discussed before and my opinion then was that the last clause "And, briefly brings up the irony of Melvin King meeting with Cory Carroll, and talking with Amber" is exactly that--a clause, not a sentence. The implied subject is "he", meaning Scott. That was my interpretation of the clause when I first read the article, and it still is.

[Devil_Anse]

I truly agree with your interpretation of the article. It does not say that Carroll's name ever came up in a discussion btw Scott and Amber.