Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Velveeta
I'm sorry, Vel, I thought this was explained, but maybe I misinterpreted the following:

"When police got a search warrant for Scott and Laci's house on February 18, they took away a lot of things from the master bedroom, including a white comforter, a blanket, a fitted bottom sheet and a top sheet-- even the ruffles and matress cover.

Detectives made a startling discovery-- a bloodstain that proved to be from Scott on the comforter on the top of the bed, disclosed a source. And in a strange twist, a pillowcase was missing from one of the pillows in the master bedroom. Investigators theorize that Scott got rid of it because it became stained or damaged as he held the pillow over Laci's face. The detectives also found blood on a door frame in the house and in his truck.

Can you tell me where I went wrong?

192 posted on 12/12/2003 4:51:01 PM PST by Sandylapper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies ]


To: Sandylapper
You didn't go wrong anywhere, LOL, it could be me getting confused.

My point was that we don't know the "reasons" for the search warrant. LE had to go to a judge to obtain the warrant for the Dec. 25th search and then for the Feb. 18th search. The **reasons** (observations, statements...etc)for the warrants were not brought up at the PH and we know next to nothing about those reasons.

Am I making sense? It's hard to articulate exactly what I'm trying to say! LOL
204 posted on 12/12/2003 5:28:57 PM PST by Velveeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson