[Canadian Outrage]

They weren't wasting time with one hair. I would save the fingerprint for the trial also. It is by far the more powerful physical type of evidence and therefore the best for a Jury to consider. As to the hair, I find it quite powerful since not many peoples markers could match SHARON ROCHA.

[Sandylapper]

You're probably right, CO, but on the surface it seems like a waste of time and tax-payer's money to me (remember all the experts that were hired), especially IF THEY HAD THE EVIDENCE THAT HE DID THE TAPING TO THE BODY. Would it really matter how he transported her to the bay? She could have been in the truck (cab or gun rack "hickey" for the lack of the correct term), or floor of the truck, in garbage bags or something else. Who cares about the hair in dispute, if they have a fingerprint on the tape of her body? I'm sure I must not be making sense.