[billbears]

"I am the one responsible for providing this information," al-Dabbagh, 40, told the Telegraph when shown the dossier. "It is 100 percent accurate."

Sheesh. Is any source not questionable? Or is it just when they don't agree with the administration does it become questionable? Why should we believe him? Thousands of man hours by 'our' inspectors and top of the line technology can't find a thing, but hey we've got this out of work general wanting to stay on the good side of the US Armed Forces so it must be true!! If it is, then I'm quite sure he would be able to lead inspectors to the 'cache'.

That is unless he has selective amnesia, but then of course there will be some excuse for that too won't there?

[looscnnn]

Oh, I see how it works. That is kinda like the "free thinking" scientists and radical religious people, if it does not fit their perception of the world it is incorrect. Why not believe him? He could trying to stay in the good graces of the US and still be telling the truth.

All that top of the line technology didn't do diddly squat to find the centrifuge and the jets that I had mentioned in a previous post. It is going to take more than the thousands of man hours by anybodies inspectors to find anything. But of course the anti-war, there is no WMD people can't seem to comprehend that. Just as you don't.

FYI, here are links for your consideration:
Centrifuge
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/wnt/2020/iraq030626_nuclear.html

Jets
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/08/01/1059480557364.html
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/8/6/105528.shtml