Amnesty International leader: left must join war on terror

http://www.mail-archive.com ^ | Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 06:04:06 -0800 | Louis Proyect

[ATOMIC_PUNK]

Amnesty International leader: left must join war on terror

---

• From: Louis Proyect
• Subject: Amnesty International leader: left must join war on terror
• Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 06:04:06 -0800

---

Why the antiwar left must confront terrorism
The director of Amnesty International USA warns that the left must confront terror with the same zeal that it battles Bush -- or risk irrelevance.

- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Mark Follman, salon.com

Nov. 15, 2003 | More than two years into the Bush administration's lurching war on terror, William Schulz, executive director of Amnesty International USA, is aiming some of his sharpest criticism not at the White House, but at the American political left. His message: Take on the terror threat, or risk irrelevance.

War protesters of various stripes, alongside anti-globalization and human rights activists, have staged several large rallies nationwide this year, channeling their anger at the Bush administration through slogans like "No blood for oil," "End the imperialist occupation" and "Regime change begins at home." But in an interview with Salon, Schulz said that the political left has thus far botched a key mission. "There's been a failure to give the necessary attention, analysis and strategizing to the effort to counter terrorism and protect our fundamental right to security," he said. "It's a serious problem."


In his new book, "Tainted Legacy: 9/11 and the Ruin of Human Rights," Schulz argues that rising global terrorism requires the left "to rethink some of our most sacred assumptions." A vigorous defense of human and civil liberties, while essential to spreading democracy worldwide, is not enough to stop terrorists from blowing up airplanes or shopping malls, he says. And that presents the left with a problem, because some of the tools needed to fight terror, such as stricter border controls or beefed up intelligence work -- and, perhaps, war against states that support terrorists -- chafe against traditional leftist values.

But protecting America's borders as well as its treasured freedoms is a daunting task. There is ample reason to decry (as Amnesty has) the deeply invasive potential of the PATRIOT Act, the secretive rounding up and prolonged detention of more than 1,200 Arabs and Muslims nationwide, and the alleged coercion -- some would call it torture -- of terror suspects by the U.S. government. Of equal concern is Washington's current distaste for multilateral diplomacy, which puts crucial alliances at risk at a time of mounting global turmoil. But it's not enough, Schulz says, to launch defiant rhetoric at a barreling, unilateralist Bush administration, even when its policies threaten to bulldoze the very cornerstones of democracy.

He raises some hard questions: If there's reason to believe the New York City subway is a prime terrorist target, should we really object to surveillance cameras in the name of privacy rights, especially if use of the evidence they obtain is limited? If democratic elections would bring a radical Islamist government to power in Pakistan that might distribute nuclear weapons to terrorists, should we still call for democracy there over military rule?

[armymarinemom]

Thanks for posting this. After reading the Time's article I needed the boost. Maybe one by one some rabid radicals will wake up.

Heck I was a tree hugger as a youth myself

[JasonC]

"Or risk irrelevance". Yeah, that'd be the worst part of it. Nutjobs killing innocent people, who cares? But precious self important denizens of Salon becoming irrelevant? Shudder...

[Salman]

I wonder how much of this is moved by genuine concern about the problem of terrorism, and how much by the thought that leftists risk losing political power if they push their pet peeves too far?

I think rather that there are a few on the left who are smart enough to realize that Islamofascists would kill them too. That the enemy of their enemy is NOT their friend. That Islamofascists are nobody's friend.

You'd think it was a no-brainer, but at least some on the left are not complete fools.

[wretchard]

No shame in that. As they say in Return of the King "all we have to do is decide what to do in the time that is given us."

[reed_inthe_wind]

Given me a breaaaak. The left knows all about borders, walls, police and especially terror.

[Alamo-Girl]

Thanks for the ping!

[IncPen]

... ideology adrift ping...

[longtermmemmory]

Either this Amnesty Guy is really worried about his own safety, (ie a Democrat who has been mugged) or he is trying to find a triangulation method to keep the left relevant and avoid extinction.

[MegaSilver]

This takes at least a step towards winning back my respect. I do think that Amnesty Int'l stands for some good things (I don't agree with their ideology on all things), but I'm extremely suspicious of their agenda as a whole.