Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Paper names '45-minute source'
BBC ^ | 12-07-2003 | BBC

Posted on 12/07/2003 4:07:04 AM PST by KQQL

An Iraqi army officer has claimed it was he who told UK intelligence that weapons of mass destruction could be used within 45 minutes of an order from Saddam Hussein. The officer, identified as Lt Col al-Dabbagh, told the London-based Sunday Telegraph newspaper he had provided several reports on the president's WMD plans from early 2002.

These included details of how frontline units were supplied with cases of WMD warheads towards the end of last year.

Downing Street has so far refused to comment on the report.

However, a spokesman said anyone with relevant information should contact the Iraq Survey Group as it hunts for WMD.

'100% accurate'

The 45-minute claim was a key component of the UK government's dossier on the threat posed by Iraq published in the run up to the invasion in March.

"I am the one responsible for providing this information," Lt Col al-Dabbagh is quoted by the newspaper as saying after he was shown the dossier.

"It is 100% accurate."

Forget 45 minutes, we could have fired these within half-an-hour

Lt Col al-Dabbagh

He told the paper how he reported on the deployment of WMD warheads to units such as the air defence command he led in the western desert.

"Forget 45 minutes, we could have fired these within half-an-hour," he was quoted as saying.

The devices were said to have been made in Iraq and designed to be launched by hand-held rocket-propelled grenades.

It is not made clear whether the weapons contained biological or chemical agents.

Lt Col al-Dabbagh said they were only to be used on personal orders from Saddam. He added that the bulk of the Iraqi army did not want to fight for Saddam.

"The west should thank God that the Iraqi army decided not to fight," he told the Telegraph.

Exile group

He said that he believed that the warheads had now been hidden at secret locations by Saddam's Fedayeen militias still in Iraq.

The Sunday Telegraph said that Lt Col al-Dabbagh had spied for the Iraqi National Accord - a London-based exile group - for several years before the war and was now working as an adviser for the Iraqi Governing Council.

Controversy has surrounded the 45 minute claim ever since it was made.

A BBC report that accused Downing Street of "sexing up" the dossier in which it was published triggered a furious row between the Corporation and the government.

During the debate government scientist Dr David Kelly was named as the source of the BBC report, and he subsequently found dead after apparently committing suicide.

The Hutton Inquiry has been investigating his death and is due to report early next year.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: aldabbagh; imminentthreat; iraq; wmd

1 posted on 12/07/2003 4:07:05 AM PST by KQQL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: KQQL
========= Chemical Warhead found in Kirkuk, Iraq, But Long-Ignored by the American [Pro-terrorist/DNC] Media =============

Chemical warhead found at an Iraqi air base, marked with a green band,
the symbol for chemical weaponry
. Trace amounts of a nerve agent were found
at two spots along the ~meter-long warhead. These amounts are consistent with
leakage from the chemically armed weapon. A 13-foot missile was found next
to it.


2 posted on 12/07/2003 4:09:59 AM PST by Diogenesis (If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Iraqi colonel: I am WMD claim source
http://www.suntimes.com/output/iraq/cst-nws-iwmd07.html

How the 45-minute claim got from Baghdad to No 10
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/12/07/wirq107.xml&sSheet=/news/2003/12/07/ixnewstop.html

Iraqi colonel: I am WMD claim source
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/story.jsp?story=470910
3 posted on 12/07/2003 4:16:02 AM PST by KQQL (^@__*^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Free the USA; ambrose
I wonder what Howard the Duck has to say about this .
4 posted on 12/07/2003 4:17:00 AM PST by KQQL (^@__*^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
ping ping PING!
5 posted on 12/07/2003 4:19:20 AM PST by EllaMinnow (I miss Chancellor Palpatine. Heck, I even miss Illbay.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Iraqi colonel: I am WMD claim source

http://www.suntimes.com/output/iraq/cst-nws-iwmd07.html


6 posted on 12/07/2003 4:37:34 AM PST by KQQL (^@__*^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
But that would mean that the President was telling the truth? Well, this won't sit well with Tom Dasshole and Terry McAwful.
7 posted on 12/07/2003 5:03:33 AM PST by mattdono (Big Arnie: "Crush the democrats, drive them before you, and hear the lamentations of the scumbags.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
I´m afraid that this hasn´t got too much attention. This is a source speaking up for the coalition, and even if the claims of this Iraqi aren´t true, at least Bush and Blair had a reason to take the WMD thing very serious.
8 posted on 12/07/2003 6:42:19 AM PST by Michael81Dus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mattdono
But that would mean that the President was telling the truth?

It means that the British dossier was not "sexed up".

9 posted on 12/07/2003 7:49:29 AM PST by cyncooper ("The evil is in plain sight")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: redlipstick
Thank you for bringing this report to my attention!
10 posted on 12/07/2003 7:49:54 AM PST by cyncooper ("The evil is in plain sight")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
This, TOO, will be ignored by our LAZY-A*S Press.

So, did David Kelley take his life in vain?

11 posted on 12/07/2003 12:51:39 PM PST by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy
So, did David Kelley take his life in vain?

My theory always has been that David Kelley had a big hand in the "sexing up" story, and when he was found out...well, we know the rest. Was it that he was mortified to be found out because he didn't think it would get that huge? Or was he simply unable to face the music once he was caught out. My opinion is Kelley was no angel.

As evidence, note that he chose of his own free will to meet surreptitiously with Andrew Gilligan who was well known to have been "reporting" propaganda during the war. Case in point from Gilligan: "The coalition is NOT at Saddam Airport", when in fact our troops certainly were there.

THAT is who Kelley chose to meet with and opine that the government had "sexed up" the dossier.

12 posted on 12/07/2003 2:03:46 PM PST by cyncooper ("The evil is in plain sight")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
I agree...it was kind of tongue in cheek. Kelley was a weasel and couldn't and didn't expect the heat. Most rats don't think a spotlight will shine on them.
13 posted on 12/07/2003 7:50:49 PM PST by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson