To: WoofDog123
Remember the river water? Remember that less than 10% of the ammunition supply sites have been checked so far?
Why is it so difficult for you to believe that these weapons existed? After all, the Iraqis used them quite often in the past.
Or are you the longest sleeper troll here?
20 posted on
12/06/2003 9:58:48 PM PST by
11B3
(Liberalism is merely another form of mental retardation.)
To: 11B3
"Why is it so difficult for you to believe that these weapons existed? After all, the Iraqis used them quite often in the past. "
Of course some weapons existed, presumably during the 1990 war and certainly in the 80's. It also seems likely weapons existed in the 90's. If you believe the bush administration's pre-war selling points, though, tremendous amounts of material should already have been secured, particularly given the number of higher-ranking regime members who have been captured or surrendered.
The iraqis used them some inthe 80's, a fact which bothered the US very little at the time. Despite the delusions of some Bushbots here, Realpolitik IS the rule, not the exception. It is fine with me as well if they wanna gas iran. The bush-1 team only brought it up when iraq went and invaded kuwait, which was not on the acceptable war-crime list.
"Or are you the longest sleeper troll here?"
I guess these days when a 4-year FR member asks 'they have been in-country 9 months, by any chance have ANY NBC WEAPONS been found?' he is obviously a secret troll planted years in advance to ask sneaky trick questions, as compared to an intelligent member of FR, who clearly sees through all these evidence-based word games. Bush said it was there, etc., so who cares if they haven't found it? Why should they even look for it, since we know it was there?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson