Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush almost unbeatable in 2004 election: Dick Morris
Correspondents Report ^ | 12/7/2003 | John Shovlean

Posted on 12/06/2003 6:30:40 PM PST by PeteFromMontana

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-117 next last
Of course, Dick Morris has been wrong about alot more than he has been right lately, but I for one will take anybody saying anything positive about this President right now. It is high time we turn the tide on this negative crud and start hearing about the good things Bush is responsible for.
1 posted on 12/06/2003 6:30:41 PM PST by PeteFromMontana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PeteFromMontana
This from the guy who predicted that Hillary would not run for the Senate, and, later, that she wouldn't win. I do, however, hope that he's right this time.
2 posted on 12/06/2003 6:39:28 PM PST by Salvey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeteFromMontana
Never count your chickens before they hatch.
3 posted on 12/06/2003 6:41:58 PM PST by jimkress (America has become Soviet Union Lite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeteFromMontana
"In fact, there's a growing view that if Howard Dean does win the nomination, President Bush could make a clean sweep among conservative southerners."

A growing view among whom? Bush made a clean sweep in the South when he wasn't president yet and he was running against Al Gore from Tennessee! True, Al Gore wasn't really thought of as a southerner, he was from Washington, but that's besides the point. Dean is for sure not a southerner. Forget it. The South is sewn up for Bush, and Florida won't be close this time. However, Dean will win California and New York, as well as most of the rust belt states and New England, so I don't think it'll be a total wipeout. I do think Missouri and New Mexico will go for Bush, whereas they went for Gore in 2000.

A lot of it depends on how much of a flake Dean will be in the general campaign, assuming he is the nominee.

4 posted on 12/06/2003 6:43:15 PM PST by Batrachian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Batrachian
CommieDean makes McGovern look conservative!

Pray for W and The Truth

5 posted on 12/06/2003 6:47:18 PM PST by bray (The Wicked Witch of NY is Melting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jimkress
I know I know.
6 posted on 12/06/2003 6:47:25 PM PST by PeteFromMontana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PeteFromMontana
"Danger, Will Robinson!"
7 posted on 12/06/2003 6:48:27 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Salvey
This from the guy who predicted that Hillary would not run for the Senate, and, later, that she wouldn't win. I do, however, hope that he's right this time.

True, but nothing he said here is totally off the wall or debatable really.

Dean is a sacrificial lamb... Frustration is really showing this go round for the liberal left. Hate and zero couth. Swing voters dont take to raving lunatics kindly.

8 posted on 12/06/2003 6:49:38 PM PST by smith288 (Did you even look at yourself in the mirror when you left the house??? Ugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PeteFromMontana
Yes, frankly, this makes me nervous. Dick Morris is always wrong. I liked it better last month, when he said that Bush's ratings were in the toilet and he was sure to lose.
9 posted on 12/06/2003 6:49:54 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeteFromMontana
Don't forget, he's usually wrong. As a strict constructionist I'm certainly not motivated to fight my way to the polls...
10 posted on 12/06/2003 6:52:11 PM PST by gorush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Batrachian
I do think Missouri and New Mexico will go for Bush, whereas they went for Gore in 2000

Missouri-Bush 2000

11 posted on 12/06/2003 6:52:45 PM PST by Holly_P (Dijon vu - the same mustard as before)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PeteFromMontana
Morris predicting this is almost enough to make me worry. He blew the 2002 mid-terms and the CA recall.

He's probably only made this prediction because it appears to be nearly a sure bet. Yes, Bush appears to be cruising to re-election, but that shouldn't be cause for complacency. All the house seats are up for grabs, and the GOP looks to pick up several senate seats.

So donate and get involved at:

http://www.georgewbush.com
12 posted on 12/06/2003 6:52:51 PM PST by zencat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Batrachian
I do think Missouri and New Mexico will go for Bush, whereas they went for Gore in 2000.

Missouri went for Bush in 2000.

13 posted on 12/06/2003 6:55:25 PM PST by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
My wife just loves the guy, but he seems to be merely self-serving. Even with his past Republican clients, I can't help but think that he's talking like this because he knows his bread is being buttered by conservatives and Fox News now.
14 posted on 12/06/2003 6:56:26 PM PST by GreatOne (You will bow down before me, Son of Jor-el!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jimkress
Never count your chickens before they hatch.

I have said this before and it bears repeating. Southern conservatives, atleast the ones I have encountered, are social conservatives, but not fiscally so. In fact, they are quite susceptible to the rich-bashing, class-envy populist themes of the Dean campaign.

Southern social conservatives are not the dyed in the wool, Ayn Rand reading, net surfing, super-informed, news-savvy conservatives like people here. I don't want to take them for granted in assuming they will vote for Bush. We need to work hard for every vote.

15 posted on 12/06/2003 6:59:44 PM PST by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PeteFromMontana
The Internet and right wing talk radio are some reasons the dems are out of power.

FR and other right wing organizations dominate the net today. The lefties started to get involved after it was too late for the last presidential election.

The Internet also forces the leftist press to cover a story they would just as soon omit since they don't further their leftist agenda. Bill Clinton would not have been impeached if it had not been for Matt Drudge and plenty of support on the internet. Morris is often wrong but I agree with him on the power of the internet.

The American hating leftists around the world haven't missed the right wing vehicle that the internet has become, by by passing the leftist lamestream media.

© 2003 WorldNetDaily.com WASHINGTON – A global summit set for next week in Geneva is expected to provide the venue for a plan to put the Internet under United Nations control.

Developing nations – including China, Syria and Vietnam – are pushing for the U.N. or one of its agencies to regulate the Internet, perhaps as soon as 2005. Diplomats from more than 60 countries plan to take up the issue at the U.N. World Information Summit in Geneva beginning next Wednesday.

16 posted on 12/06/2003 7:00:19 PM PST by Capt. Tom (Anything done in moderation shows a lack of interest. - Capt. Tom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zencat
Morris predicting this is almost enough to make me worry. He blew the 2002 mid-terms and the CA recall.

__________________________

I seem to recall a time just before the 2000 Election that he called it for Bush by a land slide, and yet I am still inclined to listen to him. I think I really took a liking to him during the Klintoon/Lewinsky mess.
17 posted on 12/06/2003 7:00:24 PM PST by PeteFromMontana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GreatOne
Bush is doing everything right!
18 posted on 12/06/2003 7:02:47 PM PST by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: PeteFromMontana
Uh-oh. Dickie-Mo rises from the depths of the sea, spews another political prediction high into the air, then disappears again into bottom-feeding spin and conjecture . Thar he blows, matey. He's a fearsome creature.
19 posted on 12/06/2003 7:03:31 PM PST by small voice in the wilderness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gorush
And Bush got it done. And I think that what he's really done is to force the Democrats to wage the campaign in the past tense.

There used to be a recession. There used to be casualties in Iraq. There used to be no coverage for prescription drugs. And that's not a great way to wage a campaign.

Don't forget, he's usually wrong.

Fortunately, he is not the strategist, just a comentator.

As a strict constructionist I'm certainly not motivated to fight my way to the polls.

Once you hear a full list of what Vermont's answer to Huey Long plans to do to the country, you will feel motivated to stop him.

So9

20 posted on 12/06/2003 7:03:51 PM PST by Servant of the 9 (Can Ben & Jerry's run the Food and Drug Administration?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson