Here again is another close-minded review of approaches to science that do not agree with you.
My approach is no less correct and yours as I said earlier. And the only fact involved here is that science has not proven evolution nor can it. Your arrogant rants give it even less credibility.
No, I only "pounce" on those who make gross mistakes in science. Your original posting was invalid at the most basic level, as based on EXPERIMENTAL (not theoretical) science.
"My approach is no less correct and yours as I said earlier."
Sorry, not true. Your "facts" are simply and grossly wrong according to real, accepted science. According to the "biblical creationist" notion of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, life itself is impossible, not to mention evolution (and a few other things like crystal growth). That mis-statement of the Second Law is simply scientifically wrong, but it is the entire underpinning of your "position".
"And the only fact involved here is that science has not proven evolution nor can it. Your arrogant rants give it even less credibility."
Again, fundamental mis-understanding of science, what it is and how it works. Evolution is currently the best explanation of how the biological world works, on the micro and macro level. If sufficient REAL, HARD, SCIENTIFIC FACTS (not creationist pseudoscience) is discovered, evolution will be either modified or abandoned. Of course, evolution is not supported by evidence as hard as thermodynamics, which is why it is a "theory" rather than a "law". But the "biblical creationist" point of view isn't even worthy of the category of "hypothesis", as it is supported by NO scientific evidence.
But you keep living in your "dream world" of pseudo-science. As the proverb says "the dog barks, but the caravan passes".
Science (and scientists) will continue to ignore the ignorant rantings of the biblical creationists until they actually have SOME evidence to support their contentions. At this point, they have none.