And since when is your opinion about theoretical science any more potent or correct than mine?
"I" don't need to "prove" it. It is accepted science. I drive the "Abrams tank" of accepted science---you and your "biblical Creationist" so-called "scientists" are the ones toodling around in the Toyota pickup of pseudo-science. The "burden of proof" is YOURS.
But just in case your are ignorant rather than stupid, here is a good Internet reference site on the Second Law of Thermodynamics that is scientifically sound.
"And since when is your opinion about theoretical science any more potent or correct than mine?"
Maybe because I have a PhD in chemistry and forty years practicing hard science???