Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Powell warns against Taiwan independence
MSNBC ^ | Dec. 5 2003 | Reuters

Posted on 12/05/2003 7:45:58 PM PST by yonif

While asserting that the escalating cross-straits rhetoric is ''not alarming,'' Powell said: ''We hope both sides will realize where their interests lie and be careful about what they say.''

Powell, speaking to reporters after escorting Jordan's King Abdullah from the State Department, said he spoke earlier by telephone with Chinese Foreign Minister Li Zhaoxing.

''We reaffirmed to the Chinese again today, and will when Premier Wen (Jiabao) is here next week, that we remain totally committed to our 'one-China' policy founded on the three communiques and the Taiwan Relations Act and we do not support an independence movement and we do not support independence for Taiwan,'' Powell said.

(Excerpt) Read more at famulus.msnbc.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; commiestate; cowardice; democracy; prc; redchina; taiwan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

1 posted on 12/05/2003 7:45:59 PM PST by yonif
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yonif
Taiwan IS Independent, when has it gone to China and asked for counsel, permission, constituitionality concerns. They ARE Free of China, so why can't they have their Indepence Day. Is someone afraid of Big Red China?
2 posted on 12/05/2003 7:48:17 PM PST by rovenstinez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rovenstinez
Is someone afraid of Big Red China?

Yup.

3 posted on 12/05/2003 7:49:43 PM PST by squidly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yonif
Powell is becoming quite the busybody isn't he? What is the big deal with Taiwan's independence?
4 posted on 12/05/2003 8:00:24 PM PST by cyborg (mutt-american)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: squidly
I am not. Let United States cut their trade with United States. By doing this it will cut their ability to finance their military, which by the way, is nothing more but reverse technology from Russia and US. One point I would like to make; to win a war is not by numbers, but by strategy and wisdom. China got their bud kicked when they thought they can just cross the border with Russians. They got their bud kicked by Americans and Taiwan’s in 50 when they tried to take over that island. One thing remains: US will have to do what Great Britain did in the late of 19 century, remilitarize Japan. This time, however Japan will know how to use its power

5 posted on 12/05/2003 8:03:48 PM PST by matrix2225
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: yonif
What in the world is wrong with this man?

Becki

6 posted on 12/05/2003 8:07:29 PM PST by Becki (Pray continually for our leaders and our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yonif
''We reaffirmed to the Chinese again today, and will when Premier Wen (Jiabao) is here next week, that we remain totally committed to our 'one-China' policy founded on the three communiques and the Taiwan Relations Act and we do not support an independence movement and we do not support independence for Taiwan,'' Powell said.

DUMB AS SH*T.

This is worthy of a pink slip. We need a new Secretary of State!

7 posted on 12/05/2003 8:07:49 PM PST by SunStar (Democrats piss me off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rovenstinez
The US needs a One-Taiwan policy
8 posted on 12/05/2003 8:10:18 PM PST by GeronL (Visit www.geocities.com/geronl.....and.....www.returnoftheprimitive.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: matrix2225
Bingo, There is more than one way to skin a cat
9 posted on 12/05/2003 8:10:50 PM PST by MJY1288 (The Democrats Have Reached Rock Bottom and The Digging Continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: matrix2225
Wasn't meaning to express fear myself either, but the question was whether or not someone is afraid, and unfortunately the answer to that is yes.

This whole business is of course very silly. Taiwan is independent, but they can't say so because China would lose face. Frankly, I've had it up to here with Orientals trying to save face, my apologies if that is your ethnic heritage.

10 posted on 12/05/2003 8:11:01 PM PST by squidly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: yonif
Good ole Powell promotes HAMAS and Arafat's interests...over Israel
And the Red Chinese commies over a democratic Taiwan....
Kinda Anti-American isnt it?
Kinda makes a person wonder how he can act so contrary to what GW says are 'His" thoughts on such subjects.....
Janus had such a face
11 posted on 12/05/2003 8:12:17 PM PST by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: squidly
Powell wants a Don't Ask Don't Tell policy about Taiwan's independence.
12 posted on 12/05/2003 8:13:24 PM PST by Swiss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: yonif
Free China (Taiwan) and free Israel. Hands off Sec. Powell!! Go home and decorate your tree.
13 posted on 12/05/2003 8:16:41 PM PST by dennisw (G_d is at war with Amalek for all generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
Just doing his job, really. State Department is nothing but a euphemism for appeasement society, since that's most of what they do. I don't like it much either, but that's the way it is.
14 posted on 12/05/2003 8:19:36 PM PST by squidly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: yonif
The Bush administration has greatly accelerated the U.S. defense relationship with Taiwan, a development that has made Beijing anxious.

Exactly. Powell can say 'Shanghai communique' all day long, but who cares? The bottom line is that talk is cheap, but advanced weaponry isn't. China knows that we have the potential to play them for real suckers.

Beijing, thanks to the pressure already applied, has been very accommodating to our requests for help with North Korea. Not as much as we'd like, however. We do retain the 'Taiwan angle' as additional leverage. We can't hand Taiwan over to them, but we can sure keep it out of their grasp.

15 posted on 12/05/2003 8:31:34 PM PST by Steel Wolf (Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
One china policy should mean a policy where Taiwan's government rules over the mainland and no communist party.
16 posted on 12/05/2003 8:31:56 PM PST by yonif ("If I Forget Thee, O Jerusalem, Let My Right Hand Wither" - Psalms 137:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Becki
What in the world is wrong with this MAN? What in the world is wrong with this administration allowing this MAN to voice such comments. I am getting really tired of Clinton-light from what was SUPPOSED to be a conservative (at least MORE conservative) administration.
17 posted on 12/05/2003 8:33:58 PM PST by ImpotentRage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All
"The advance of freedom is the calling of our time; it is the calling of our country.

But with all the tests and all the challenges of our age, this is, above all, the age of liberty." President George W. Bush November 6, 2003

Prove it W!  Talk is cheap, either we stand for liberty and freedom or we dont.

18 posted on 12/05/2003 8:35:32 PM PST by RWR8189
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
In addition, by principle, supporting the establishment of a Palestinian Arab state is against freedom as well, as the establishment will be of a terrorist, dictatorial state.
19 posted on 12/05/2003 8:36:47 PM PST by yonif ("If I Forget Thee, O Jerusalem, Let My Right Hand Wither" - Psalms 137:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SunStar
DUMB AS SH*T. This is worthy of a pink slip. We need a new Secretary of State!

---------------------

Uh, he acting on Bush's orders. You don't need a new Secretary of State. We need a new president. Why is it you are so reluctant to say that?

20 posted on 12/05/2003 8:37:00 PM PST by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson