Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hate The Bushes If You Like But Mind How You Do It
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 12-6-2003 | Alec Russell

Posted on 12/05/2003 6:48:45 PM PST by blam

Hate the Bushes if you like but mind how you do it

By Alec Russell
(Filed: 06/12/2003)

Many in Europe believe that America after September 11 will not brook an angry word against George W Bush. Well, those days are now over - at least as long as you follow American etiquette in how to hate a president.

Mr Bush on the Time cover

Denouncing Mr Bush is the latest trend to dominate the talk shows. This week the anger industry moved into new territory with the launch of Michigan's equivalent of the "Calendar Girls".

"Babes Against Bush" is a pin-up calendar whose pictures are to be accompanied by lists of Mr Bush's "mistakes and manglings of the truth".

"Sure it's not quite politically correct, but what better way is there to get guys to notice that the president is a bozo," said one of the participants, Eleanor Vast-Binder.

This is not just the whimsy of some sassy Michigan liberals. Time magazine, the grand and ever so slightly ponderous weekly news bible, gave its blessing to the trend in its latest issue.

Its cover has a picture of Mr Bush with a lipstick kiss on his right cheek and a badly bruised left eye. "Love Him! Hate Him!" says the headline. "Why George Bush arouses such passion, and what it means for the country."

Of course most Americans have better things to do this weekend than surf the internet to order their calendar. This is primarily a phenomenon of the West and East coasts, those traditional strongholds of anti-Republican sentiment.

Polls suggest a majority thinks Mr Bush is doing a good job and his personal ratings are even higher - the critical factor for any president.

But the nation is clearly polarised. Mr Bush's grin is either a heart-warming reminder that the nation is in safe hands or a smirk that embodies all that is weaselly and moronic about the man in charge.

In a sign of the mood, Gertrude Jones, an 81-year-old from New Orleans, decided she did not want wreaths or cards when she died. Instead her obituary message asked for donations "to any organisation that seeks the removal of George Bush from office".

The anger is fuelled by a welter of factors: frustration at Mr Bush's lingering popularity, resentment about the desperately-close 2000 election and indignation at his uncompromising policies at home and abroad, in particular his tax cuts and the war in Iraq.

It is a little disingenuous of Republicans to raise their eyebrows. Liberals are merely apeing the anti-Clinton fury that consumed conservatives in the Nineties. In recent weeks the Clinton-era anti-liberal rants have been supplanted on the best-seller lists by tirades against the administration.

The titles "Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them - A Fair and Balanced Look At The Right" or "Bushwhacked" tell you all you need to know.

But as Democrat activists found this week, it may now be OK to "feel" the hatred, but you have to be careful how you express it.

A Hollywood gathering billed by one of its organisers as a "Hate Bush" rally backfired badly after it was leaked. She had forgotten the golden rule of politics: denounce the policies, but mind how you treat the president, he is the father of the nation.

"We do not hate George Bush. I never used the word Hate Bush," the organisers said with clenched teeth at a hastily staged press conference, as Republicans huffed and puffed about "hate speech" and the affront to national dignity.

It is no surprise that the depiction of Mr Bush as a Frankenstein's monster on the cover of one of the most successful anti-Bush books, The Great Unravelling, is only on the British edition.

You only had to watch Thursday's gooey coverage on the networks of the First Lady previewing the White House Christmas decorations to understand the Democrats' difficulty.

The Bushes come across as the all-American presidential couple - hate them by all means, but mind how you do it.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bushes; bushhaters; hate; how; lefties; mind
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 12/05/2003 6:48:46 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam
My wife is begging me to take her to London next year, but I think I'll wait until 2005, after Bush is re-elected, so I can shove the fact up these limey's asses!
2 posted on 12/05/2003 6:52:10 PM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
This is primarily a phenomenon of the West and East coasts, those traditional strongholds of anti-Republican sentiment.

As well as anti-America, anti-family, anti-Christian, anti-white male, etc.

3 posted on 12/05/2003 6:54:20 PM PST by Paul Atreides (Is it really so difficult to post the entire article?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
I wonder how many at the "Hate Bush" Rally arrived in their Suv's with "Hate is not a Family Value" stickers on the bumper?
4 posted on 12/05/2003 6:55:02 PM PST by Kozak (Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam; CovenBuster
"Babes Against Bush" is a pin-up calendar whose pictures are to be accompanied by lists of Mr Bush's "mistakes and manglings of the truth".


Shouldn't it be renamed to "Boobs against truth", and feature photos of Barbara Boxer, Tom Daschle and Hillary Clinton instead?

We could fix the pixellation on Hillary's privates so that they don't hang lower than Daschle's.
5 posted on 12/05/2003 6:59:04 PM PST by cleochatra ({Republican chia pet--slather on the common sense and just add water!})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Just to show how low the RATS will go, over on DU they have an animated picture of Jesus Christ slapping President Bush in the face over and over again. It's sickening.
6 posted on 12/05/2003 7:00:40 PM PST by Wait4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam
I listened to Sean Hannity interviewing Babe Ms. November and she freaked out when he asked her who the Vice-President was. She was a typical moron, she just kept repeating the same thing over and over like she was reading from a script. Sort of the same way that the morons at Verizon speak when you try to call in a trouble with your phone line. Ms. November didn't hate Bush but was against him because she kept getting turned down for health insurance coverage for a supposed pre-existing condition for her daughter. Yeah that's his fault I mean he is pro Big-Business and all. LOL
7 posted on 12/05/2003 7:00:55 PM PST by rocksblues (Keep em Flying and come home safe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
My hubby was watching an interview of one of those tramps from "Babes Against Bush" and when asked if she knew who the vice president of the United States was....she admitted that she didn't! I was a little glad that she admitted this, but I also thought she was real stupid.
8 posted on 12/05/2003 7:03:32 PM PST by Arpege92
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
This week the anger industry moved into new territory with the launch of Michigan's equivalent of the "Calendar Girls". --- "Babes Against Bush" is a pin-up calendar whose pictures are to be accompanied by lists of Mr Bush's "mistakes and manglings of the truth".

On Hannity today, he interviewed a "Babe" (against Bush). After she told about the calendar, Hannity asked here a couple questions, like "who is the Vice-president". Her answer was "do you mean the vice-president of the calendar company?". "No, I mean the Vice-president of the United States". The "babe" quickly, turned and talked to someone in the room with her...said what Hannity asked and then said, I "better not talk to him, I don't know the answer, I'm just a girl who posed for the picture and he's trying to fool me into saying something" (or pretty close to this).

A riot!
9 posted on 12/05/2003 7:03:44 PM PST by Jackson Brown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Eleanor Vast-Binder

Is that her name or are they talking her underwear? On another note, if see were reduced by 50%, would she be Eleanor Half-Vast-Binder?

10 posted on 12/05/2003 7:04:31 PM PST by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wait4Truth
I'll take your word for it; I've never been to DU.
11 posted on 12/05/2003 7:07:36 PM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blam
But the nation is clearly polarised.

Undoubtedly, it's us against the assholes.

12 posted on 12/05/2003 7:11:01 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cleochatra
We could fix the pixellation on Hillary's privates so that they don't hang lower than Daschle's.

There doesn't exist a graphics software package to even approximate such a transformation.

13 posted on 12/05/2003 7:14:42 PM PST by StatesEnemy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
My wife is begging me to take her to London next year, but I think I'll wait until 2005

Go next year only if you want to pay out the nose because of the currency exchange rates.

It's at least 50% more expensive than it was three years ago.

14 posted on 12/05/2003 7:16:25 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
I don't blame you. I just go there to see what the enemy is saying. The RAT talking points are displayed there daily.
15 posted on 12/05/2003 7:24:45 PM PST by Wait4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: blam

17 posted on 12/05/2003 7:28:16 PM PST by Happy2BMe (2004 - Who WILL the TERRORISTS vote for? - - Not George W. Bush, THAT'S for sure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rocksblues
Bimbos Against Bush is more like it...of course these are the type of trashbags that would be on their knees for Beelzebubba in a New York minute! Why even pollute the airwaves by giving them an interview?
18 posted on 12/05/2003 7:40:15 PM PST by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cleochatra
Thanks a lot!

spook wipes diet pop from monitor. :-)

19 posted on 12/05/2003 7:49:13 PM PST by spookycc (Never forgive! Never forget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Frank_2001
You are right! But then again the more these moron's are heard by the so called independents the better for Bush.
20 posted on 12/05/2003 8:10:43 PM PST by rocksblues (Keep em Flying and come home safe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson