To: walford
Please don't presume to speak for me. The problem is that there isn't a monolithic view among conservatives as to end of life issues. I, and the majority of conservatives, hold that the state, church and family members should not exercise undue control over end of life issues.
Let me put it another way. My life and my death belong to me. The state, courts and family members have limited interest in those rights. I don't yield my rights to others. In fact I claim them as my own. To the extent this applies to Terri's situation, she has the same rights.
23 posted on
12/05/2003 12:01:13 PM PST by
Wheee The People
(If this post doesn't make any sense, then it also doubles as a bump.)
To: Wheee The People
Terri has retained rights herself as a matter of fact, just like you do. She had no living will; no advanced directives. You proclaim that you have rights but Terri does not. I hate hypocrisy but I love birthday parties.
24 posted on
12/05/2003 12:06:52 PM PST by
floriduh voter
(www.conservative-spirit.org freeper site)
To: Wheee The People
To the extent this applies to Terri's situation, she has the same rights. Then maybe you shouldn't take the side of letting her husband speak for her.
25 posted on
12/05/2003 12:08:03 PM PST by
Coop
(God bless our troops!)
To: Wheee The People
Let me put it another way. My life and my death belong to me. The state, courts and family members have limited interest in those rights. I don't yield my rights to others. In fact I claim them as my own. To the extent this applies to Terri's situation, she has the same rights. This means that you have filed a living will stating that, when you are deemed useless by society, you will submit to being legally starved to death. Well? Hey Dr. Kevorkian's parole was denied, so you're shit out of luck for the lethal injection...
91 posted on
12/05/2003 9:47:05 PM PST by
TheSpottedOwl
(I'd rather have dead rats in my walls, than Hillary for President.,)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson