Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hating Bush (Cathryn Crawford)
Washington Dispatch ^ | December 5, 2003 | Cathryn Crawford

Posted on 12/05/2003 8:26:01 AM PST by Scenic Sounds

Hating President Bush has become a national pastime. It seems almost funny, how one man can stir up the ire of so many people. There are all sorts of reasons to hate the President. When BestandWorst.com asked their readers why they hate Bush, there were all sorts of reasons, which ranged from “because he fits way too many anti-Christ proficiencies, seriously”, to. “No, the question is - who would let an ugly monkey rule a nation?” Now, these are funny – somewhat because of the ignorance (a President doesn’t rule a nation), and somewhat because of the wording (ugly monkey?).

But, seriously, Democrats – especially those who are running for President in 2004 - love this outpouring of rage, and they’re quick to do their best to channel it. There are “I hate Bush” bumper stickers, t-shirts, underwear. There are myriad websites devoted to the subject. There was even a recent Bush-hating conference held in Hollywood. The Democrats want as many people as possible to think it’s cool to hate Bush, and they’re pushing it as hard as possible.

However, is their policy of hate actually going to win them any votes in 2004? Sure, there are the die-hard, “yellow dog” Democrats, (as we call them in the South). But these guys don’t just hate Bush – they hate Republicans in general. Actually, they hate Independents and Greens and Libertarians, too – everyone but Democrats. A hate-Bush policy isn’t likely to affect them one way or another. They’re going to vote the same way they always do.

Then there is that elusive group of middle-ground voters. This is an eclectic group. Contained here are the so-called soccer moms, the white Southern guys with the Confederate flags hanging in their trucks, the college students who are trying to figure out who is who and what ideology fits them best. These are the people that are truly struggling (for the most part) to make the right decision. Most have already formed opinions about which political party they agree with, and most tend to vote one way or another on a regular basis. However, these are the people that the Democrats are struggling to plug into the electricity of their rage and ire against the President.

Democrats, however, don’t seem to understand how silly, futile and powerless this attitude makes them look. Most people do not respond well to purely reactionary policies, but that’s what the Democrats are using. There doesn’t seem to be a unified plan among them; there’s just a lot of smoke and hot air and rage and screaming. It makes one wonder if the Democrats would exist were Bush not in office. They have become the party of the anti-Bush – the party that isn’t the Republicans.

I have to admit – I’m not one of those people that want the Democrats to just vanish from sight, though I sympathize with those who do. As in economics, a little competition usually improves the quality of the end result. However, Democrats are marketing themselves so badly lately that it’s not even a competition anymore – it’s like watching a big man finally kick the crap out of the dog that’s been nipping its heels. You feel a bit sorry for the dog, but you thoroughly enjoy watching. And so it is now. Politics is about practicality. If the Democrats think that hating Bush is going to win those votes, they’re going to continue to push that policy as hard as they can, even when it means getting kicked. It didn’t work in 2000, it backfired horribly in 2002, but they simply can’t learn their lesson. Maybe they need another kick.

Cathryn Crawford is a student at the University of Texas. She can be reached with questions or comments at CathrynCrawford@WashingtonDispatch.com.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; bushhaters; democrats; hate; poorwriting
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-136 next last
To: Scenic Sounds
Actually, out here in California, some of GW's biggest supporters are the 30 some group and the late 20 group.

Most are young parents, and 9/11 really impacted them.

These young voters were part of the reason we were able to vote out Herr Davis.

I see more rats in the Boomers and the pre Boomers my age out here in California. For the most part they have hated America since the 1960/70's and relate very well to the Clintoons and the thugs who support the Clintoons. Howie Dean is a favorite of many who don't support the Clintoons.
41 posted on 12/05/2003 9:13:10 AM PST by Grampa Dave (Sore@US, the Evil Daddy War bucks, has owned the Demonic Rats for decades!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
do go on:

selling nuclear technology to China for campaign contributions

hosting Russian mob figures at the WH

Lying under oath

Accepting campaign contributions at the WH

using the WH phones for fund raising

renting out the Lincoln bedroom

witness intimidation

Cattle futures

Paula, Kathleen, Monica, Jennifer, Juanita, etc, etc

and I've only just begun. bj was a genuine charlatan. There is no comparison w/ W. None.

42 posted on 12/05/2003 9:14:45 AM PST by Pietro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Steel Wolf
Thus, the burden is on the Democrats to persuade people that they have a better vision for the future, and a clear plan on how to realize that vision.

The dems are incapable of doing this.

43 posted on 12/05/2003 9:16:23 AM PST by Cobra64 (Babes should wear Bullet Bras - www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Scenic Sounds
>It's those younger folks. What can we do with them? ;-)

Hey, I'm a generation Xer and I voted for Clinton first term. I was 20 and full of all sorts of ideals instilled in me from kindergarten. "Wouldn't it be great if everyone had the same thing?" I also thought Bill Clinton was "cooler" than George Bush because Bill Clinton went on MTV and "seemed" to care about me and my generation. George Bush didn't know what a grocery store scanner was (or so I thought after reading the biased media portrayal of that). After growing up a bit, realizing that while it's nice for everyone to have the same thing in theory. Fact is that I was working my butt off while others were slacking and they got part of what I worked for. I also had children and got some morals up under me and realized that I didn't want a sleazebag cheater/lying jerk running this country. By the time his terms was up, I voted for George W. Bush.
I was grateful that Clinton did the welfare reform act. If a republican had pushed for it, it wouldn't have gotten anywhere. I DO hate that damn medicare drug bill though. Policitally I understand it, pocketbook wise, I don't.
44 posted on 12/05/2003 9:16:40 AM PST by sunryse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
The average Dem doesn't bother me

It's the Commies that call themselves Dems that do

Is there an issue or position that defines that distinction for you?

45 posted on 12/05/2003 9:16:56 AM PST by Scenic Sounds (Pero treinta miles al resto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Scenic Sounds
I thought "Hate" was a bad think. "Hate Speach" is supposed to be bad. Wouldn't "Hating" a person lead to violence or murder. I think the "Hate Bush" conference was evil and a symptom of a problem in our land.

It is a problem the Democrats now own.

46 posted on 12/05/2003 9:18:31 AM PST by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
Hey, we elected Arnold, didn't we?

California is Bush country now!! ;-)

47 posted on 12/05/2003 9:18:43 AM PST by Scenic Sounds (Pero treinta miles al resto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: MEG33; Cathryn Crawford
It does seem to be the main policy point..Hate Bush.

Seems like they are grasping at anything they can to try and defeat Bush. His latest approval rating is 61% and the left is enraged.

How many of the alaphabet networks have had anything about Bush's approval rating since it jumped to over 60%?

Zip - zero - nada.

48 posted on 12/05/2003 9:20:02 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 (Laura Ingraham and Ann Coulter are living proof that not all blondes are dumb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sr4402
I thought "Hate" was a bad think. "Hate Speach" is supposed to be bad. Wouldn't "Hating" a person lead to violence or murder. I think the "Hate Bush" conference was evil and a symptom of a problem in our land.

It is a problem the Democrats now own.

Like you, I'm feeling a lot of love for our political adversaries this morning! ;-)

49 posted on 12/05/2003 9:20:19 AM PST by Scenic Sounds (Pero treinta miles al resto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Cathryn Crawford
The 'rats are starting to resemble snarling rabid lemmings, who are so blinded by hate that while they think they are attacking Bush in a mighty bonzai charge, they don't see the sea cliff ahead of them.

Good riddance to this party of socialists and commie-loving traitors. I wonder what new party will rise from the ashes?

50 posted on 12/05/2003 9:20:31 AM PST by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sunryse
. George Bush didn't know what a grocery store scanner was (or so I thought after reading the biased media portrayal of that).

I always thought that was one of the lamest arguments

1) store scanners were just coming out back then

2) Tell me when a President goes food shopping??

51 posted on 12/05/2003 9:21:13 AM PST by Mo1 (House Work, If you do it right , will kill you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Scenic Sounds
Is there an issue or position that defines that distinction for you?

Here are two examples I was thinking of

My mother is an average dem .. I don't agree with her politics, but she isn't out to destroy our country and put it under UN control

The Party of Clinton is

52 posted on 12/05/2003 9:24:03 AM PST by Mo1 (House Work, If you do it right , will kill you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: sunryse
George Bush didn't know what a grocery store scanner was (or so I thought after reading the biased media portrayal of that).

I remember that! The truth is that he did know about the store scanners.

The media just used that story to make us think that, because he was the President, he didn't hang out in grocery lines like the rest of us.

53 posted on 12/05/2003 9:24:12 AM PST by Scenic Sounds (Pero treinta miles al resto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Cathryn Crawford; Scenic Sounds
SSSSSHHHHHHH.....be very, very quiet.....let them go on. I want all (especially young voters) to see them for what they are - devoid of anything good and only interested in their own power.
54 posted on 12/05/2003 9:25:55 AM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RobertM
I think that bunch in Hollywood is tied in with the George Soros group.He's put up millions in order to defeat Bush.
55 posted on 12/05/2003 9:26:30 AM PST by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
My mother is an average dem .. I don't agree with her politics, but she isn't out to destroy our country and put it under UN control

The Party of Clinton is

Yes, our national sovereignty is an important issue. And it's going to be even more important in the future.

Good post!

56 posted on 12/05/2003 9:26:53 AM PST by Scenic Sounds (Pero treinta miles al resto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Scenic Sounds
I have to admit – I’m not one of those people that want the Democrats to just vanish from sight, though I sympathize with those who do

At this point I'd like to see the Dems, if not vanish, at least diminish to a 3rd party.

Say what you want about the domestic policies of Dems like FDR and LBJ. At least, they believed in the greatness of America and defending the nation. Much of today's Democratic Party rejects this. Lieberman and maybe Gephardt are the only two of the nine Presidential candidates I think would stand up for the country.

We cannot have a major political party where 80% of its leaders are, for all intents and purposes, opposed to the safety of the nation. Indeed, we shouldn't need to be debating this.

I don't agree with the Democrats on the budget, taxes, and economy, but by all means that is what we should be debating. I agree with the Dems on some social issues -- gay marriage, for example -- and that is an issue that the nation needs to be (and is) debating.

But we should not have to debate whether America should be defended. Both major parties should, almost reflexively, turn to the defense of America. Any debate on that should be how to best go about it.

If the Dems are unwilling to defend America, they need to go away. I hope that the next 20 years or so, sees the GOP divide into two parties -- either along libertarian vs. conservative lines or sort of a moderate Democrats/Northeastern Republicans vs. Remaining GOP lines -- and the Dems fade into history.

Then we will again have two major parties that believe in America, arguing over which has the better ideas for it. As it should be.

57 posted on 12/05/2003 9:27:23 AM PST by Celtjew Libertarian (Shake Hands with the Serpent: Poetry by Charles Lipsig aka Celtjew http://books.lulu.com/lipsig)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952
They don't discuss Bush polls unless the word "plummeting" can be used.
58 posted on 12/05/2003 9:29:00 AM PST by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Celtjew Libertarian
A very thoughtful post. You point out some interesting trends that may very well prove to be correct.
59 posted on 12/05/2003 9:30:55 AM PST by Scenic Sounds (Pero treinta miles al resto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Scenic Sounds
Thanks.

The other possibility, perhaps, is that as the New Left Boomers die off, the Democratic Party will snap back to its relative senses.
60 posted on 12/05/2003 9:36:24 AM PST by Celtjew Libertarian (Shake Hands with the Serpent: Poetry by Charles Lipsig aka Celtjew http://books.lulu.com/lipsig)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-136 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson