To: doug from upland
For those who say that parents are responsible for their children, not the government, this will make it a little easier for them to make decisions for their children. I like labeling too (not mandated of course), but does anyone need a warning to know a donut isn't good for you?
It's like putting a "don't touch" sign on the business end of a chainsaw.
23 posted on
12/05/2003 8:41:53 AM PST by
freeeee
(I may disagree with what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it)
To: freeeee
You took the words right out of my mouth...er, keyboard.
25 posted on
12/05/2003 8:43:29 AM PST by
T.Smith
To: freeeee
but does anyone need a warning to know a donut isn't good for you? The best evidence is to look at virtually any cop over the age of 50.
26 posted on
12/05/2003 8:46:11 AM PST by
jackbill
To: freeeee
Unfortunately, we have millions and millions of stupid people will do stupid things. If the warnings aren't there, it is a bonanza for the slimy trial lawyers. I remember a case in which an idiot lifted up his power mower to trim the hedges. He, of course, was injured. I think lawn mowers now have that warning.
I think one of the most necessary warning labels may never be used. It should be a warning label after the name of each candidate with a (D) after his name.
33 posted on
12/05/2003 9:23:55 AM PST by
doug from upland
(Hillary would get 100% of the Islamist Terrorist vote)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson