Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Study: Smoking Cannabis Causes Damage to Lungs
Reuters to My Yahoo! ^ | Patricia Reaney

Posted on 12/05/2003 6:52:42 AM PST by Pharmboy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-193 next last
To: Quick1
No, no . . . you were right the first time.

It provides a great way to rid the world of liberals.
41 posted on 12/05/2003 8:49:12 AM PST by DustyMoment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
Prior to your post in this thread, I don't recall people calling for marijuana to be banned because it CAUSES LUNG CANCER.

So you agree that this is a "no $hit" study, and any government funds to it were basically wasted?

42 posted on 12/05/2003 8:50:23 AM PST by jmc813 (Help save a life - www.marrow.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
Hey jmc813, MrLeRoy stole your screen name! I can tell by the post.

Wrong, sorry, a correction must be issued.

LeRoy is now known as "No King But Jesus"

43 posted on 12/05/2003 8:53:46 AM PST by AxelPaulsenJr (Excellence In Posting Since 1999)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr
Your obsession with LeRoy is starting to freak me out. You find him so interesting that you discuss him on your profile page? Sheesh, even Chief Jackson got over it eventually.
44 posted on 12/05/2003 8:56:56 AM PST by jmc813 (Help save a life - www.marrow.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
"If it were legal, you could consume it wastefully as tea, or in filtered cigarettes"

Not to mention in various food and drink preparations. All these methods get you just as high or higher (I've heard), but use a lot more weed in the process. Smoking's only advantage is that it makes an artifically expensive product go further. Therefore, if people suffer lung damage it is partly their fault for consuming marijuana at all, but it's also partly the fault of policies that make it too expensive to consume in ways that do not involve the lungs.
45 posted on 12/05/2003 8:57:13 AM PST by Stirner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
So you admit that No King but Jesus is LeRoy?
46 posted on 12/05/2003 8:58:18 AM PST by AxelPaulsenJr (Excellence In Posting Since 1999)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr
I work 65 hours a week and date women. I have MUCH more important things to worry about than who's using which screenname on Free Republic.
47 posted on 12/05/2003 9:00:04 AM PST by jmc813 (Help save a life - www.marrow.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
Now that is really uncalled for, I am sorry that I ever heard your sorry name. Please delete me from any and all of your ping lists.

That is really sorry.

48 posted on 12/05/2003 9:01:15 AM PST by AxelPaulsenJr (Excellence In Posting Since 1999)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr
Are you responding to the right person? Wht on Earth did I say that was offensive? Please realize that I honestly did not intend maliciousness.
49 posted on 12/05/2003 9:03:24 AM PST by jmc813 (Help save a life - www.marrow.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
Help me out here, Paulsen. Do you see anything I said that warranted the response in 48?
50 posted on 12/05/2003 9:06:24 AM PST by jmc813 (Help save a life - www.marrow.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Stirner
"Not to mention in various food and drink preparations."


mmmmmm, BROWNIES! But, the main problem is that the more you eat, the more you eat! Plus, it feeds the chocoholics needs, at the same time!
51 posted on 12/05/2003 9:11:37 AM PST by pageonetoo (Rush is Right. But, his drug use was wrong! That's OK, he's Rush, it's gotta be OK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
"So you agree that this is a "no $hit" study, and any government funds to it were basically wasted?"

Well, yeah.

But this study is important for one reason -- when a "certain someone" on this board says, "Provide evidence for your claim" ..... voila!

52 posted on 12/05/2003 9:13:04 AM PST by robertpaulsen (No matter where you go ... there you are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr
Yeah, in full force, with no attempt at hiding it (uses exactly the same cites - says he copied them from "another poster").

He doesn't care. I guess it's OK with the AMs. Maybe because he's not posting articles?

53 posted on 12/05/2003 9:17:38 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
Could you address my post 50 please? I'm confused as all heck.
54 posted on 12/05/2003 9:21:05 AM PST by jmc813 (Help save a life - www.marrow.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
No. I'm as surprised as you.

The only thing I can think of is your statement, "and I date women". That came out of the blue and appears to be a slap. Like saying, "I don't have time for you, I like women."

But I'm really reaching.

55 posted on 12/05/2003 9:26:18 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: breakem
I wonder how much government money was spent on this startling discovery.

Even though it was likely British money that was wasted rather than American, I still get depressed thinking about how much governments spend on this kind of crap.

56 posted on 12/05/2003 9:27:44 AM PST by RebelBanker (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen; AxelPaulsenJr
The only thing I can think of is your statement, "and I date women". That came out of the blue and appears to be a slap. Like saying, "I don't have time for you, I like women." But I'm really reaching.

Maybe he interpereted that as me implying that he doesn't like women? I have jokingly made insinuations about his affinity for figure skating in the past, but it was all in friendly humor.

Axel, What got you freaked out about my post? I like you. If I didn't like you, you'd know.

57 posted on 12/05/2003 9:29:48 AM PST by jmc813 (Help save a life - www.marrow.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
"If I didn't like you, you'd know."

President Muffley: It's a friendly call. Of course it's a friendly call. Listen, if it wasn't friendly, ... you probably wouldn't have even got it.

58 posted on 12/05/2003 9:36:00 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
LOL, sorry for over reacting, but I did take your statement that you date women, to mean that I have some kind of gay fixation on LeRoy. I don't LOL.
59 posted on 12/05/2003 9:37:30 AM PST by AxelPaulsenJr (Excellence In Posting Since 1999)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
From the Department of Obviousness: Smoking Causes Damage to Lungs
60 posted on 12/05/2003 9:37:47 AM PST by Liberal Classic (No better friend, no worse enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-193 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson