Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: deport
It was either gas fired or coal plants since I don't believe there's been a nuclear unit licensed stateside in the last 25 years or more. Natural gas offers ease of transport, clean, economical, etc but I still think it should be limited and reserved for the value it has other than heat.

The fuel price alone for natural gas fired plants is 5 cents per kwhr. That price fluxuates wildly based on other demands. The fuel price for coal plants is probably about a penny per kwhr. Obvously it's free for wind power. Wind power is already competitive on price with gas but will have to be developed more to compete with coal.

Passive solar is fine but it takes people who will adjust to using it rather than the normal mentality of flipping a switch for instant power/heat/cool.

Passive solar just means your house is way cheaper to heat. My parents heat their house for about 150 bucks per year, with electricity, here in cold ole Iowa. That's about 1/10 to 1/20 as much as a standard house.

55 posted on 12/05/2003 10:07:46 AM PST by biblewonk (I must answer all bible questions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: biblewonk
Passive solar just means your house is way cheaper to heat.


Well where heating is important, but to some of us it's not... Cooling is the major item by far. Houses can be designed and constructed with todays technology to reduce the heat gain/loss to very minimal numbers... Almost to the point of an unsafe inside environment due to lack of air changes...
59 posted on 12/05/2003 10:40:54 AM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson