This guy is a joke.
1 posted on
12/05/2003 6:14:29 AM PST by
JohnGalt
To: aristeides; J. L. Chamberlain; Liz; pttttt
2 posted on
12/05/2003 6:16:51 AM PST by
JohnGalt
(How few were left who had seen the Republic!---Tacitus)
To: JohnGalt
More self-dealing from a government insider.
To: JohnGalt
And pretty close to being a crook.
5 posted on
12/05/2003 6:33:17 AM PST by
expatpat
To: JohnGalt
Mr Perle did not disclose that Boeing had committed to invest $20m in his venture capital fund, Trireme Partners, in mid-2002.
I'm shocked.
6 posted on
12/05/2003 6:34:00 AM PST by
mr.pink
To: JohnGalt; Shermy; Fred Mertz
Funny that this is just coming out now, after the tanker deal has fallen apart.
To: JohnGalt
So did Daschles wife!
To: JohnGalt
"Linda Daschle, Linda Daschle, Lin-da Da-schle..." That's the name of the high powered lobbyist that's been conspicuously absent from every single news story written on the scandal over the Pentagon renting Boeing aircraft to be used as refueling tankers when it would save taxpayers billions to simply buy them outright. Boeing CEO Phil Condit has resigned over this deal.
Linda Daschle, wife of Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle, is a highly paid (just how highly we don't know since she and her husband refuse to release their income tax records) lobbyist for this company and for this deal. The EIB Network was one of the earliest whistleblowers on the tanker scandal, and remains the only news outlet to remind everyone that Linda Daschle plays a key role in ramming it through Congress. By law, Mrs. Daschle is barred from lobbying the Senate, folks. Do we not have a right to at least ask if she broke any laws in lobbying using her husband's influence to win this $18 billion contract?
Boeing has fired two officials for ethical violations including their CEO, folks. After screaming about Enron for two years are the Democrats going to hold their own house to less of a standard than an eeeevil corporation? How can we not have heard the name of the lobbyist that put the deal together mentioned in the mainstream press? How can Congress - which investigates allegations of wrongdoing without any evidence whatsoever, but merely based on the "seriousness of the charge" - not at least ask a few questions?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson