[Kevin Curry]

A belief in theism isn't required to enable a thinking man to come to the conclusion that homosexuality is a willing perversion of the physiologically heterosexual (binary) nature of humankind. Simple common sense is more than sufficient.

[adam_az]

A belief in theism isn't required to enable a thinking man to come to the conclusion that homosexuality is a willing perversion of the physiologically heterosexual (binary) nature of humankind. Simple common sense is more than sufficient.

The binary scheme is required for reproduction of the species. Period. If it's so simple, please explain the logical steps which show that man should only do things which are necessary for the reproduction and continuation of the species, and nothing else? How many things do you do, strictly for your own pleasure, that have nothing to do with that lofty purpose? Why are they any less a perversion of your purpose here on earth?

[Amelia]

A belief in theism isn't required to enable a thinking man to come to the conclusion that homosexuality is a willing perversion of the physiologically heterosexual (binary) nature of humankind. Simple common sense is more than sufficient.

I'd bet that you don't know any homosexuals personally.

I don't think homosexuality is right, and it certainly doesn't make biological or evolutionary sense (which is probably why all the major religions of the world oppose it), but I tend not to believe that most homosexuals choose to be that way.

They might possibly in some urban areas like San Francisco, but here in the Bible belt where it is considered perverted and disgusting, not sophisticated or chic? Why would anyone purposely choose homosexuality here?