Skip to comments.
Florida State Attorney Persecuting Rush Limbaugh is Democrat--Liberal Media Not Telling.
JosephCamhi
Posted on 12/05/2003 1:42:39 AM PST by j.cam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 141-156 next last
To: j.cam
Persecuting?
There are charges against Rush that if proven true would constitute felong crime. When you live in a glass house..................
Shall we get a republican DA to do the investigation?
81
posted on
12/05/2003 8:20:46 AM PST
by
breakem
To: breakem
felong crime is what that sect in China does. This would be called felony.
82
posted on
12/05/2003 8:30:05 AM PST
by
breakem
To: Cacophonous
What I heard was that he paid her for her services. Had you only claimed bribery, you would still have some credibility. You lost all credibility when you claimed he was accused of extortion when there was none, and you claimed threats, etc, but produced nothing. You seem like a shill.
And you claim hypocrisy when I clearly stated that I have always been against these drug laws for people who suffer pain. Do I have to repeat it again?
83
posted on
12/05/2003 9:10:47 AM PST
by
j.cam
To: breakem
So you believe it is right to only apply these laws to Ruch because he is a conservative.
Speaking of glass houses, do you believe Anita, liberal?
84
posted on
12/05/2003 9:12:21 AM PST
by
j.cam
Comment #85 Removed by Moderator
To: j.cam
Are you calling me a liberal or are you asking if I believe Anita is liberal. Looks like you're calling me liberal.
If it's liberal to want the law applied to the rich and famous, then I'm guilty. If it's liberal to say you're stuck with whatever DA, repub or dem, you have in your county, then I'm liberal. If it's liberal to point out hypocracy because our boy is on the grill, then I'm liberal.
You don't seem to know me or you wouldn't ask such a stupid question.
As for your inference that I said it's ok to apply these laws only to Rush because he's conservative, your inference is a weird interpretation of my post, but hey, have fun.
I'm sure you will regale me with the number of examples of those democrats in this county who did what Rush is alledged to have done, had those allegations made to the police or DA, and then walked away without an investigation. Then and only then can you make a case about selective prosecution. And oh, being the objective, thinking conservative that I am, I will acknowledge your facts.
86
posted on
12/05/2003 9:59:35 AM PST
by
breakem
To: j.cam
It's a good thing, then, that your opinion of me is of so little consequence...
87
posted on
12/05/2003 11:07:02 AM PST
by
Cacophonous
(Thought and innovation are disturbances of regularity and...tolerated only for...readaptations...)
To: Tickled Pink
On this same subject of selective prosecution, you might want to check out this thread: Thanks for that interesting little tidbit !
88
posted on
12/05/2003 11:46:31 AM PST
by
ladyinred
(The Left have blood on their hands!)
To: VRWC_minion
Thank God Rush us being agressively investigated. Otherwise he would still be abusing. The law is working as its intended.That's assuming alot. I hear that the whole thing is a hoax made up to give him cover for attending some super secret CFR meeting with Bush in Texas.
89
posted on
12/05/2003 12:00:28 PM PST
by
1Old Pro
To: Lando Lincoln; Ben Hecks; dix; tubebender; Don Carlos; oprahstheantichrist; nutmeg; cyborg; ...
90
posted on
12/05/2003 12:31:07 PM PST
by
ConservativeMan55
(A tiger is a tiger. Some things you can't change no matter how hard you try.)
To: ConservativeMan55
BTTT!!!!!
91
posted on
12/05/2003 12:31:34 PM PST
by
E.G.C.
To: ConservativeMan55
Be Well ~ Be Armed ~ Be Safe ~ Molon Labe!
92
posted on
12/05/2003 12:38:08 PM PST
by
blackie
To: blackie
Thanks! I will!
93
posted on
12/05/2003 12:38:53 PM PST
by
ConservativeMan55
(A tiger is a tiger. Some things you can't change no matter how hard you try.)
To: Cacophonous
"The stories said he payed off the housekeeper. That's bribery at the least."
Bribery????? Bribery involves paying PUBLIC OFFICIALS to get some result. The maid is not a public official.
Paying off a private individual not to "expose" you often falls under the heading "blackmail" and the person paying is generally considered the victim of the crime of blackmail.
94
posted on
12/05/2003 12:56:00 PM PST
by
Montfort
To: ConservativeMan55
Good man!
95
posted on
12/05/2003 1:15:09 PM PST
by
blackie
To: dyno35
What about littering?? Driving while using a cell phone or without a seat belt?
So you think illegally obtaining drugs, a crime in Florida known as doctor shopping,
is no different than littering? I think the WOD is a travesty. Are you anti-WOD or just a partisan making excuses for one of 'ours'?
96
posted on
12/05/2003 1:55:03 PM PST
by
gcruse
(http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
To: breakem
You said:
"As for your inference that I said it's ok to apply these laws only to Rush because he's conservative, your inference is a weird interpretation of my post, but hey, have fun." "Weird"? Strange. That was the point of my original post with the quote from Alan Dershowtiz to which YOU were RESPONDING. Do you think you are more credible in this area than Alan Dershowitz????? You must be so full of liberal hate that you are not comprehending what you read.
You said: "I'm sure you will regale me with the number of examples of those democrats in this county who did what Rush is alleged to have done, had those allegations made to the police or DA, and then walked away without an investigation. Then and only then can you make a case about selective prosecution. And oh, being the objective, thinking conservative that I am, I will acknowledge your facts."
I don't need to. I cited a credible authority, an expert in the field with no reason to lie to help Rush: Alan Dershowitz. You have cited nothing. All you have done is blather and back up none of it.
Also, according to every report I have heard, millions of Americans are addicted to prescription pain medicine, and you still haven't produced any evidence that you are correct and Alan Dershowitz is wrong, and that these millions of people are being arrested.
97
posted on
12/05/2003 2:49:54 PM PST
by
j.cam
To: gcruse
Do you have any evidence that you are correct and Alan Dershowitz is wrong??? Do you have any statistics showing that of the millions who are addicted to prescription pain medicine, many or even some are being arrested?
98
posted on
12/05/2003 2:52:02 PM PST
by
j.cam
To: j.cam
bump
99
posted on
12/05/2003 3:37:24 PM PST
by
GOPJ
To: j.cam
bump
100
posted on
12/05/2003 3:37:33 PM PST
by
GOPJ
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 141-156 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson