To: pollywog
It looks as if they are proposing a FREEZE not a CUT.
(a) (1) It is the intent of the Legislature to limit the caseload of the regional centers to the total number of individuals served by regional centers as of December 31, 2003. - FREEZE
(2) Effective January 1, 2004, the total number of consumers for whom each regional center provides service coordination, develops an individual program plan or purchase of services or supports may not exceed the total number of consumers who were served by that regional center on December 31, 2003. - FREEZE
However, regional centers shall continue to provide each individual with intake and assessment and shall determine whether each individual would be eligible for services if the caseload were not limited.
(3) Effective January 1, 2004, no regional center may make new consumers eligible for services unless and until attrition occurs at that regional center. In determining which consumers are to be added to the regional center's caseload, the regional centers shall give priority to those consumers whose health or safety is jeopardized. - FREEZE
(b) The prohibitions contained in subdivision (a) shall not apply to consumers transitioning from a developmental center or state- operated facility pursuant to a community placement plan.
(c) (1) It is the intent of the Legislature that regional centers shall not exceed the amount appropriated for regional center services in the annual Budget Act, even if the result is that consumers with developmental disabilities are denied services or supports that have been included in the consumer's individual program plan. - NO DEFICIT SPENDING!
(2) Notwithstanding any provision of law or regulation, including, but not limited to, the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act and the California Early Intervention Services Act, no regional center may expend more than the amount allocated in that center's contract with the State Department of Developmental Services for that fiscal year. - NO DEFICIT SPENDING!
(3) Each regional center shall have the authority to deny, modify, reduce or terminate services to any consumer, including, but not limited to, those services and supports identified in the consumer's individual program plan.
(4) Unless required by the Social Security Act or Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, none of the provisions of Chapter 7, section 4700 et seq., including the right to fair hearing, shall apply to any consumer whose services or supports have been denied, modified, reduced or terminated pursuant to this section.
I may be wrong, but I read this as a spending freeze not a cut.
57 posted on
12/04/2003 8:42:01 PM PST by
Weimdog
To: Weimdog; pollywog
In "liberalese", a freeze is a cut.
77 posted on
12/04/2003 9:12:46 PM PST by
Pan_Yans Wife
("Your joy is your sorrow unmasked." --- GIBRAN)
To: Weimdog
Thank you for going to the trouble to clarify this.
149 posted on
12/05/2003 11:20:30 PM PST by
hocndoc
(Choice is the # 1 killer in the US)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson