Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Numbers Guy
Sure, cut the check to the recipient and let them pay for the service. Make it like food stamps, call it health stamps or something.
44 posted on 12/04/2003 8:26:35 PM PST by GeronL (Visit www.geocities.com/geronl.....and.....www.returnoftheprimitive.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: GeronL
Sure, cut the check to the recipient and let them pay for the service. Make it like food stamps, call it health stamps or something.

And what if they don't turn around and pay for the service. What's the hospital going to do, spend the next few months sending bill collectors after the person? You think hospitals would like that? The reason Medicaid pays the bills directly to the provider is because neither the state nor the provider trusts the recipient to spend the check on the service. And you'd be creating an even greater delay in the provider receiving payment. Hospitals are already up in arms about slow payments from insurance companies, Medicare, and Medicaid. Just imagine how annoyed they'll be when they have to wait even longer for Johnny Welfare to get around to paying the bill.

49 posted on 12/04/2003 8:36:14 PM PST by Numbers Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson