The only party the Clintons helped in their eight years was the GOP. Look at the statistics. They were a windfall for us.
If Clark wins, he takes Hillary as his VP, it's a Clinton win. They keep McAwful and the party strings.
If Dean gets wins, the Clintons lose power for a few months, then ride back on a white horse after the worst presidential defeat in history. Again, a Clinton win.
The basic premise is: what's good for the Clinton's is good for the Clinton's. The democrats got carved into special interest groups with no cohesive binding philosophy beyond the outstretched hand (feed me, feed me money). They're ripe for political manipulation. And the best manipulators are: the Clintons.
Why would the party consider keeping Clinton/McAuliffe after that string of losses? What would an iron-clad fist around the reins of the DNC by Clinton/McAuliffe, in light of that record and with four more years of Bush, say to the masses within the Democrat party? When will they say that enough is enough? -PJ