[archy]

Well - see 106 for facts on the trace of Foster's gun.

Find the tracer, you find the killer, IMO.

Well, not necessarily. There's an excellent chance that someone's left that as a false trail, especially if it's a fed spook from a former federal agency wantung to leave some muddy tracks on the agency or supervisors he left behind him, or on a bureaucratic rival. But it's an excellent starting point.

Now TU, how could this finding possibly reach a no biggie cocensus?

Regards,

*****

oops ...'concensus'

Ooops, ooops: That's *consensus*

-archy-/-

[Triple]

Thanks - I should have paid more attention in spelling class.

Best Regards,

[Tymesup]

Here are some links to FR threads:

http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3acb4f135489.htm
Posts 18, 98 and 106 are interesting. Michael Rivero, in post 119, notes that Foster's death got him interested in government lies.

http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b0d35501a23.htm
Post 31, by goseminoles, is a letter from Reed Irvine.