Your initial question to my post #40 misrepresented my position and I encourage you to read my previous posts on this thread. In addition to your misrepresenting my position, I've repeatedly asked you to clarify an ambiguous statement (post 44) as I don't want to assume anything. Your unwillingness to clarify tells me you're not interested in a discussion and I'm not going to waste my time assuming what I think you said. Please clarify.
The pedophile sites I listed justify their actions by believing adult/child love is not detrimental to the child. The APA has also made a similar statement. Is this something you agree with?
I asked you a direct question about your evidence of the APA position. This is the third time I've asked. You seem incapable of giving a direct answer. I did not misrepresent your position I tried to clarify.
You have done nothing but attack. This tells me you are unable to verify your comment with facts. This is typical of propagandists. Attack when asked even simple questions.
I leave you to your followers.