[scripter]

When confronted with a simple question...

Your question was very misleading from anything I said. Perhaps you're completely unaware of the content at the pedophile websites (I listed in post 31) that use exactly the justification I stated to molest kids. Perhaps you know the content and want to misdirect the discussion away from the websites? I hope not.

You also said:

I believe you are responding to a paper presented my 1 pysch and disavowed by the organization.

Your statement above has at least 1 typo. Again: "I'm not going to assume anything here: To what paper and organization are you referring?"

[breakem]

I apologize, for just reading your 77 with a serious question. If you read your post I initially replied to you would see the organization that you yourself brought up.