Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TOP500 List of World’s Fastest Supercomputers Released - Mac G5 cluster is 3rd fastest
Top 500 Computers ^ | 11/16/2003

Posted on 12/03/2003 6:21:59 PM PST by Swordmaker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last
Virginia Tech's Mac G5 based cluster placed 3rd overall... using 2Mhz 970s. Apple will soon be releasing the 3MHz 970s. I wonder what rating they will get? Perhaps a cluster built with them will take over the number two spot.

Hmmm... PC based Pentium4 Xeon placed 4th, and Itanium2 based clusted placed 5th.

I guess that answers that question.

1 posted on 12/03/2003 6:22:00 PM PST by Swordmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
2Mhz 970s

Wow...my Apple //c+ was faster than 2MHz :-)

2 posted on 12/03/2003 6:23:48 PM PST by krb (the statement on the other side of this tagline is false)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
You betcha it does...
3 posted on 12/03/2003 6:25:38 PM PST by snowrip ("Going to war without the French is like going hunting without your lawnmower.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *Macuser_list
ping
4 posted on 12/03/2003 6:29:02 PM PST by Vermonter (No sweatshop labor was used in the production of this tag line)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: Vermonter
An Apple a day...
7 posted on 12/03/2003 6:44:03 PM PST by billhilly (If you're lurking here from DU, I trust this post will make you sick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
Already, 131 systems report a Linpack performance exceeding 1 Tflop/s. Performance levels at all positions of the TOP500 list keep growing impressively, driven by Moore’s Law. The total combined performance of all 500 computers on the list exceeded the level of half a “petaflop/s” (or quadrillion of calculations per second). It is now 528 TFlop/s, compared to 375 Tflop/s just six months ago. The “slowest” system on the newest listing is now 403.4 Gflop/s (“gigaflops” or billions of calculations per second), compared to 245.1 Gflop/s six months ago.

Moore's law can still be applied. :D

8 posted on 12/03/2003 6:47:45 PM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
The Earth Simulator supercomputer retains the number one position with its Linpack benchmark performance of 35.86 Tflop/s (“teraflops” or trillions of calculations per second). It was built by NEC

I owned a NEC computer. This can't be the same company. -Tom

9 posted on 12/03/2003 6:50:13 PM PST by Capt. Tom (Anything done in moderation shows a lack of interest. - Capt. Tom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: krb
Mhz 970s Wow...my Apple //c+ was faster than 2MHz :-)

Oops... 2Ghz!! gadzooks!

10 posted on 12/03/2003 7:10:34 PM PST by Swordmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Yehuda
what kinds of calculations we talking about (simulation of an earthquake? 1000 photoshop filters run on 1000 images?)

For most of the machines, and all of the cluster ones, the idea is to break down the problem into smaller pieces, run each smaller piece on one of the CPUs, then combine the results together to come up with the answer.

Examples include: simulation of a nuclear bomb explosion (you can calculate each portion of the 3D space separately); finite-element analysis of the aerodynamic properties of a car or airplane's wing (split the surface into 1 inch sections and compute them separately); that sort of thing.

It doesn't make Freeping any faster, however :-)

11 posted on 12/03/2003 7:18:06 PM PST by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; sourcery
ping
12 posted on 12/03/2003 7:35:15 PM PST by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
"This cluster is built with the Apple G5 as building blocks..."

....however no one would write any apps for it so it died like all other apples.
13 posted on 12/03/2003 7:41:38 PM PST by JSteff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000; general_re; Sabretooth; basil; SengirV; zarf; pageonetoo; Glenn; Izzy Dunne; Yeti; ...
Ping for speed...
14 posted on 12/03/2003 7:50:37 PM PST by Swordmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
I guess that answers that question.

What was the question? ;)

Actually, I'll be the first to pee in the pool here. I still have yet to see any neutral benchmarks, SPEC in particular, that show the 2 GHz G5 outperforming top of the line Xeons or I2s. At best so far, performance appears to be on par with Xeons on a clock-for-clock basis, which is what gives the edge to Intel for the moment - higher clock rates.

So I tend to discount the notion that the G5 is inherently faster than the 3 GHz Xeons per se, and I'll guess that the real difference is in the networking technology - many of the Intel systems are built on older Myrinet interconnects, and it seems likely that the newer Infiniband stuff is faster and/or more efficient than Myrinet or the Quadrics interconnects. That being said, what's most impressive about the VT cluster, to my mind, is the bang for the buck they achieved - #3 is pretty dang impressive considering how much (little) they spent to get there.

BTW, my alma mater ranks in the top 40. How about yours? ;)

15 posted on 12/03/2003 8:17:22 PM PST by general_re (Knife goes in, guts come out! That's what Osaka Food Concern is all about!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
You get up to the need for that speed, you will likely be running a server, at which point you can run Win2k advanced server, run NLB (across 32 servers), cluster service, 8-way SMP and support up to 32 processors .

And G5 may be fast, but isn't nice to also have the ability to be compatible?
16 posted on 12/03/2003 8:30:48 PM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: Libertarianize the GOP; *tech_index
Thanks for the ping!

I've got to upgrade my machine, it just seems so slow now.

Newegg has a nice special on an AMD 64 3200+ with ASUS board and CoolerMaster Heat Sink for $525 after a small rebate. That could get me started ! LOL!!!

18 posted on 12/03/2003 9:21:04 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Davis is now out of Arnoold's Office , Bout Time!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
And VT's cluster uses half the number of computers that the Xeon cluster. Therefore the Mac G5 processor is over twice as fast.
19 posted on 12/03/2003 9:29:06 PM PST by Wacka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSteff
That's funny because I have Microsoft Office loaded on my Mac. What PC users often fail to grasp is that having a choice of 100,000 programs that aren't worth the CDs that they are distributed on isn't all that useful. And if you absolutely positively need to run a Windows program, VirtualPC lets you run Windows XP in a window on your Mac.
20 posted on 12/03/2003 10:25:04 PM PST by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson