Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How the White House Fooled NPR
NPR ^ | 12/03/03 | Jeffrey A. Dvorkin

Posted on 12/03/2003 5:02:07 PM PST by Drango

Media Matters

December 3, 2003

How the White House Fooled NPR

By Jeffrey A. Dvorkin

Ombudsman

National Public Radio

While most journalists were enjoying a few days respite over Thanksgiving, the White House managed to stage an impressive photo-op with the president in Baghdad. Astonishingly, it occurred without the usual presence of the White House press corps. More astonishing was the lamb-like response of many in the media to the White House sleight-of-hand.

Collusion seemed to be the order of the day, as reporters were assured that the usual "pool coverage" of the president would be in force over the Thanksgiving weekend. Here's how it happened.

'Pool' Coverage

"Pool" is the euphemism for giving a few reporters the obligation of covering for everybody else. Normally, the pool consists of a print reporter, a television reporter and crew, a radio reporter, along with the three main wire services plus a still photographer or two. All would be assigned to be with the president over a holiday period. Not that the journalists get to sit down with the first family. They are usually camped outside the presidential compound.

The pool reporters file the obligatory story based on a White House press release for all print and broadcast media. The reporters are then stationed nearby on the off chance that news might break out. Occasionally an NPR White House correspondent draws that proverbially short straw.

NPR normally would not rebroadcast the pool report unless the NPR reporter has the pool position. If not, the NPR duty reporter would re-write the pool copy and put his or her own voice on it. The presumption is that the pool reporter is a trusted and reliable journalist who would not file a story he or she did not know to be accurate.

'Where’s the President?'

While the rest of the White House press corps was in tryptophan torpor, President Bush was winging his way to Baghdad.

NPR (along with every other media outlet) reported that the president and Mrs. Bush were in Crawford, Texas according to a statement released by Deputy Press Secretary Claire Buchan. Ms. Buchan, it turns out, was also unaware of the president's true location.

NPR’s Don Gonyea reported this:

"Coming off a week in which he won a big legislative victory on Medicare reforms... the president will be joined by family... including his two daughters and his parents... for a traditional Thanksgiving dinner at the 1,600- acre Prairie-Chapel ranch. The names of other guests of Mr. Bush and the first lady have not been released... but the president often entertains friends from his time in Texas politics... as well as members of his senior staff."

As a report, it was technically correct. It inferred and did not confirm that the president was spending Thanksgiving in Crawford. But the White House claimed that for reasons of national security, the White House press corps could not be told where the president was.

Fox -- Yes. CNN and NPR -- No!

If NPR appears with egg on its face, then consider CNN. It was in the normal rotation that day to provide the pool reports.

Again Don Gonyea:

"CNN was told by the White House on (Thanksgiving) that they could stand down because there would be no other news that day. Of course, later that evening Bush was en route to Baghdad with a Fox TV crew aboard."

A total of 13 media people went to Baghdad, including Fox News, the Associated Press, The Washington Post, Bloomberg News, Reuters, photographers from Time and Newsweek and three wire service reporters.

No radio reporter was asked to come along, and that strikes Gonyea (and me) as inherently unfair: Personally, I'd like very much to have gone... in order to witness this event in person... but would have had real problems not being able to tell my editors that I was going AND to consult with them beforehand. The Fox TV reporter was able to tell his desk. The Washington Post reporter apparently was not, according to reports I've read. There was NO radio reporter at all among the assembled PRESS POOL on Air Force One that day either. That's another thing I have a serious problem with. When the president travels he is supposed to be accompanied by the POOL... and that POOL should include radio. Gonyea and other journalists have said that they recognize that secrecy and deception may have been the only way to safely pull this trip to Baghdad off, but, he notes:

There are legitimate questions to be raised as to whether or not this is an appropriate reason for such a deception. This was not about national security, or keeping a military operation a secret.

Ron Elving is NPR’s senior Washington editor. He agrees with Gonyea that this was a highly political and partisan event:

My own feeling is that it raises a fundamental question when the president and his staff can lie about his whereabouts. If it's supposed to be okay under special circumstances... who's to say which circumstances? This was not a matter of national security, of defending the nation or of defending the president himself. It was done to make possible a photo op. Great as PR. Sketchy as stewardship of the office.

Government and Media: Together Again?

Exactly what the media was told may have gone relatively unnoticed in the United States, but a number of overseas journalists contacted me to ask how the American media could allow this to happen without a more vigorous protest.

Typical was an e-mail from Joao Baptista Natali, a reporter with the Brazilian newspaper Folha de Sao Paolo:

For journalists outside the U.S., it seems that this fact was just an extra stone in a solid consensus wall that government and media have been building together after Sept. 11.

That consensus wall seems unconscionably high to many journalists, both inside and outside the United States. But many domestic commentators disagree. One opined that this "was the only way the president could fulfill a great presidential tradition (of) serving food to troops under the present circumstances, so the deception was justified."

More worrisome is that it also seems to evoke another less venerable but longstanding presidential tradition -- that of deceiving the press. NPR and other media need to make sure we won’t get fooled again.

Listeners can contact me at 202-513-3245 or by e-mail at ombudsman@npr.org.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bushinbaghdad; defundnpr; npr; presspool; thanksgivingvisit; weasels
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
NPR is throwing a snit 'cause they weren't invited on Air Force 1. In doing so, the assert the odious claim that the president must sublimate his security to their news god.
1 posted on 12/03/2003 5:02:08 PM PST by Drango
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Drango
Fox made it very clear that it just happened to be their day on the rotation. It could have easily been another station. NPR sucks.
2 posted on 12/03/2003 5:05:31 PM PST by ItisaReligionofPeace (I'm from the government and I'm here to help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango
Memo to NPR: don't bite the hand that feeds you, lest you end up looking like the turkey.
3 posted on 12/03/2003 5:06:23 PM PST by alancarp (With all of that sweeping under the rug, it's a wonder how DEMs can walk on their lumpy carpets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango
Whining leftist Clymers. W should say "it's a matter of trust". I'm surprised Reuters got to go...
4 posted on 12/03/2003 5:07:44 PM PST by eureka! (Rats and Presstitutes lie--they have to in order to survive.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul; Timesink; sauropod
I don't have my NPR/PBS ping list as I'm on travel...Instead I'll ping some people from old threads.
5 posted on 12/03/2003 5:08:13 PM PST by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango
DEFUND PBS/NPR NOW!

If the libs want their own television and radio stations, let them pay for them themselves. LEAVE ME OUT!

6 posted on 12/03/2003 5:08:52 PM PST by Pharmboy (Dems lie 'cause they have to...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango
Gee, did they ever stop to think that they weren't invited because they have already proven themselves untrustworthy?
7 posted on 12/03/2003 5:08:56 PM PST by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango
A total of 13 media people went to Baghdad, including Fox News, the Associated Press, The Washington Post, Bloomberg News, Reuters, photographers from Time and Newsweek and three wire service reporters.

All of these organizations are typical media lefties save for Fox.

8 posted on 12/03/2003 5:09:00 PM PST by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango
Get over it, NPR! It's been almost a whole week since the story came out. The American public saw it, were impressed with the gesture and the cloak and dagger aspect of it, they approved of it, they absorbed it, and then they moved on. End of story.
9 posted on 12/03/2003 5:09:38 PM PST by wimpycat ("I'm mean, but I make up for it by bein' real healthy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango
This was not about national security

When the president goes to the hottest hotspot on the planet, he becomes a target. Keeping the bad guys from finding out that he's in range is about national security. And anybody who can't figure that out is too stupid or corrupt to bother talking to.

10 posted on 12/03/2003 5:10:37 PM PST by irv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango
First the NY Slimes complains that they weren't included in the press gaggle that went to Baghdad and now we've got NPR whining. It saddens me so...
11 posted on 12/03/2003 5:10:49 PM PST by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango
I didn't get through the whole thing the author just sounded too petty and bitter.
12 posted on 12/03/2003 5:10:58 PM PST by Tempest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango
First off, to them it was only a "photo-op"---not a moral-raising effort that (I believe) was definitely needed.

Second is this bullscite--

"This was not a matter of national security, of defending the nation or of defending the president himself."

Yes it was. The president and the troops gathered at the airport certainly would have been in danger if you guys ratted him out. You don't care. The President knows that. Since the mission was only a "photo-op" to these a$$wipes, it had no effect on "defending the nation" even though it improved troops' morale.
13 posted on 12/03/2003 5:11:13 PM PST by stands2reason ("Don't funk with my funk."--Bootsy Collins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango
or keeping a military operation a secret.

Hmmm. The CINC is going by military jet flown by military officers to a war zone to meet with US troops and local government officials. Gee, NPR, it sounds like a military operation to me.

/john

14 posted on 12/03/2003 5:11:16 PM PST by JRandomFreeper (I'm just a cook.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango
time to defund this bunch.......
15 posted on 12/03/2003 5:11:59 PM PST by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango
Nya Nya Nya Nya Nya!
16 posted on 12/03/2003 5:12:11 PM PST by numberonepal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

RADIO FREE REPUBLIC ON NOW, 5PM PACIFIC 8PM EASTERN

JEFF GANNON'S WASHINGTON WITH SPECIAL GUEST SEN. CORNYN, R-TX

LISTEN LIVE

CHAT

17 posted on 12/03/2003 5:12:25 PM PST by diotima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Drango
his was not about national security, or keeping a military operation a secret.

If flying Air Force One into a battle zone and out is not a "military operation", then what the heck is?

18 posted on 12/03/2003 5:12:44 PM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango
NPR and other media need to make sure we won’t get fooled again.

NPR just announced that they would not protect the security of the President of the United States going into a war zone. Hope the White House catches this so they don't include them the next time, either.

19 posted on 12/03/2003 5:13:36 PM PST by Wait4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango
If they had included NPR, it could have been perceived as being unfair to Al-Jazeera (the only reason for excluding Al-Jazeera would have been that they aren't American).
20 posted on 12/03/2003 5:13:58 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson