Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Right Wing Professor; Phaedrus
Phaedrus: He then proceeds to select from a shelf, placed off to one side, one of a range of human emotions, "anxiety" for example, to justify his points. Well, there can be no anxiety since that is brain function, too.

RWP: Animals clearly show anxiety; even some comparatively simple animals. When you swat a housefly and miss, for a while afterwards the housefly is reluctant to land, and when it does, stays still for a much briefer interval. Does a house-fly have free will?

I think you just made Phaedrus' point.

822 posted on 12/10/2003 11:10:10 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 816 | View Replies ]


To: Alamo-Girl
I think you just made Phaedrus' point.

I don't see how.

The possibilities are these:

  1. Emotion is not compatible with determinism. Animal 'emotions' bear no relationship to human emotions. Animals are deterministic, humans are not
  2. Emotion is not compatible with determinism. Animal 'emotions' are at least partly equivalent to human emotions; neither animals nor humans are deterministic.
  3. Emotion is compatible with determinism. Animal 'emotions' are at least partly equivalent to human emotions; the existence of emotions does not bear on the question of whether animals and humans are deterministic.
I choose 3.
836 posted on 12/10/2003 12:29:57 PM PST by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 822 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson