Oh, so if I mention homosexual activity i'm obsessed with it? Perhaps you should take a remedial reading course, or at least drop the screen name that refers to a learned and literate man. Why don't you try answering my real point, which was that the Freepers who are really obsessed with sodomy are the ones who believe any opposition to such behavior is tantamount to Iranian-style theocracy?
Many state laws violate our BOR's. They are not done away with until changed by 'we the people', or until successfully challenged in the courts. - IE, -- CA's gun prohibition was unsuccessfully challenged last week. The USSC refused to "do away" with it. Does this refusal justify it, in your view?
Hmmm...allow me to recommend that remedial reading course again, since you ignored my question completely. If you answer my question, I'll answer yours. My question was, "If anti-sodomy and other such laws violate the sanctitiy of the home that the Founders placed in the Bill of Rights, why didn't they [The Founders] do away with such laws?"
No. And certainly, the obsession on this issue lies almost entirely on the side of those who believe our Republic will fall if we do not immediately embrace butt-pumping as a major factor underlying Truth, Justice and the American Way.
You say 'no', then show your obsession with "butt pumping" in the next line. Weird.
Oh, so if I mention homosexual activity i'm obsessed with it?
Taken in context, your own remarks say you are.
Why don't you try answering my real point, which was that the Freepers who are really obsessed with sodomy are the ones who believe any opposition to such behavior is tantamount to Iranian-style theocracy?
Ah yesss, your real point is to claim constitutionalist freepers are 'obsessed'.
If anti-sodomy and other such laws violate the sanctitiy of the home that the Founders placed in the Bill of Rights, why didn't they do away with such laws?
Many state laws violate our BOR's.
They are not done away with until changed by 'we the people', or until successfully challenged in the courts.
- IE, -- CA's gun prohibition was unsuccessfully challenged last week. The USSC refused to "do away" with it.
Does this refusal justify state gun bans, in your view?
--- you ignored my question completely. If you answer my question, I'll answer yours.
No, - I answered your question on 'doing away with laws', - directly.
I suspect you cannot answer my question because you approve of a 'states right' to enact prohibitive type 'laws', -- even anti-gun laws.