Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why some gun owners are unhappy with Bush
Christian Science Monitor ^ | December 04, 2003 | Todd Wilkinson

Posted on 12/03/2003 3:29:48 PM PST by yonif

When Jimmie Rosenbruch went north last month, bound for the high country of southeast Alaska to stalk mountain goats, the Utah sportsman and master hunting guide toted more than a rifle into the wilderness. Mr. Rosenbruch, a burly lifelong Republican and acquaintance of former President George H.W. Bush, also carried personal displeasure over the natural- resource agenda of Mr. Bush's son.

In particular, Rosenbruch and a groundswell of other gun owners from the lower 48 are challenging the Bush administration's plan to undo protection of Alaska's Tongass and Chugach national forests by opening both to increased logging and road construction.

For the current president, who relied upon unwavering support from the so-called "hook and bullet" crowd to win in 2000, the kind of public criticism now being voiced by political conservatives like Rosenbruch represents a potential problem in 2004, observers say.

According to a report from the Fish and Wildlife Service, hunters and anglers are a formidable force not only in what they spend, but also in the political power they wield. More than 34 million Americans over age 16 fish annually; 13 million hunt.

Many analysts think most of these people are Republican and supportive of President Bush. But now, a growing vocal minority is taking a stand on concerns they have - from weakening water protection standards in fishable waterways, to proposals to drill for oil in what have been off-limits areas. These people want a clean and healthy environment not only for hunters and anglers, but for all Americans - and they believe Bush is straying too far from this principle.

Petition in circulation

Perhaps no example is more poignant than a recent petition signed by hundreds of gun clubs - on behalf of untold thousands of members - telling Dale Bosworth, Forest Service chief, to keep in place Clinton-era protection of old-growth forests, two-thirds of which lie in Alaska.

"The response took me by surprise, especially in Texas," says Greg Petrich, the petition organizer, who is also a registered Alaska Republican and former commercial fisherman.

When Mr. Petrich began circulating the petition in October, he modestly hoped to enlist 100 gun clubs in the lower 48. But the response has been so overwhelming that he now believes he'll have 500 organizations signed up by the end of the year. The list of supporters includes the Allegheny Country Rifle Club of Pittsburgh (oldest gun club in the US), 49 combat handgun clubs, and 40 shooting groups in Mr. Bush's home state of Texas.

In addition, conservation organizations like Trout Unlimited, with its large membership of suburban "country club" Republicans who love to fly-fish, have questioned the Bush administration's opening of pristine public lands to natural-resource development.

Opinion polls have made the Bush administration well aware that its handling of the environment holds resonance as a serious domestic campaign issue. And analysts see the millions of suburban sport shooters and rural hunters - traditionally the core of the National Rifle Association (NRA) membership - as representing an important swing vote.

One of those joining Petrich's campaign is Carl Rosier, a state game and fish commissioner who served under former Alaska Gov. Wally Hickel, a stalwart conservative Republican.

Reached in Juneau, Mr. Rosier explained that proposed oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge - which he supports - is the battle front that most Americans associate with Alaska. But the Bush administration's current efforts to restore publicly subsidized logging of Alaskan rain forest will also be a green lightning rod in the coming months.

"You've got a bunch of timber beasts [former timber-industry lobbyists] setting environmental policy in Alaska, and that's wrong," Rosier says. "In three years, we've witnessed a 180-degree swing from Bill Clinton to George W. Bush."

Both Rosier and Rosenbruch believe in "reasonable" resource extraction, but they say Republicans are adrift from the stewardship principles championed a century ago by GOP President Theodore Roosevelt. Such sentiments could cost candidates at the polls.

Too alarmist?

Yet many backers of the president believe that Bush has nothing to fear. With its 4 million members, the NRA doesn't see a large number of gun owners turning against Bush. "Without a doubt, he has the strongest support among NRA members of any modern president," says J.P. Nelson, the NRA's Western field director based in Mesa, Ariz. "We were mobilized in the last election, and we will be again."

Still Petrich, who is a member of the Northern Sportsmen Network, says not all hunters need to support Tongass protection in order to seize the attention of campaign strategists. "Small percentages of voters could have a big impact in 2004," Petrich says. "If this administration senses that more hunters and shooters are becoming ambivalent about Bush because of his conservation agenda, it could force them to reconsider what they're doing in wild places like the Tongass."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bang; banglist; bushadmin; environment; gunowners
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 12/03/2003 3:29:49 PM PST by yonif
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *bang_list
BANG
2 posted on 12/03/2003 3:30:02 PM PST by yonif ("If I Forget Thee, O Jerusalem, Let My Right Hand Wither" - Psalms 137:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yonif; Jeff Head
LOL! Enviromentalist gun owners.

Jeff what would you have said to these guys during the Klamath Falls controversy?

3 posted on 12/03/2003 3:38:10 PM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yonif
Yeah. We'll be a lot better off when Dean is President. Like some aquaintance of the first Bush (He tore up his lifetime NRA membership card remember?) is some purebred conservative.

We need to worry more about if Bush let's them keep creating these "wilderness areas" out of whole cloth.

They are trying to create one called "Wild Sky" here in Washington. It would surely protect us hunters and fishermen. As long as you want to hike in 40 miles for your elk hunt and then pack the animal out because you can't drive a motorized vehicle in the wilderness area. That is, unless you're a govt. worker.
4 posted on 12/03/2003 3:41:25 PM PST by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig (Since when did calling someone a cowboy become an insult?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane
"I'm selling a book and need exposure"?

Naaah.
5 posted on 12/03/2003 3:45:47 PM PST by IAvet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dane
I'm on the same side as you on something.

This article is absolute horsecrap served on a roof shingle.

6 posted on 12/03/2003 3:45:59 PM PST by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: yonif
I expected the Assault Weapons Ban to be mentioned, but oh no----

these guys are attacking him from the envirowacko left!
7 posted on 12/03/2003 3:47:38 PM PST by stands2reason ("Don't funk with my funk."--Bootsy Collins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane
I would quote his own words to him:
"In three years, we've witnessed a 180-degree swing from Bill Clinton to George W. Bush."

...they say Republicans are adrift from the stewardship principles championed a century ago by GOP President Theodore Roosevelt.
And say to him that this is exactly right and it is long past time. The wheel has turned...or perhaps the gun chamber.
8 posted on 12/03/2003 3:48:25 PM PST by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason
these guys are attacking him from the envirowacko left!

I agree

9 posted on 12/03/2003 3:48:45 PM PST by yonif ("If I Forget Thee, O Jerusalem, Let My Right Hand Wither" - Psalms 137:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: yonif
Republicans aren't LIBERAL enough *whine*bump
10 posted on 12/03/2003 3:49:43 PM PST by stands2reason ("Don't funk with my funk."--Bootsy Collins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IAvet
Pretty cheap shot there.
11 posted on 12/03/2003 3:50:53 PM PST by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
Don't you have a pinglist for something like this?
12 posted on 12/03/2003 3:51:14 PM PST by stands2reason ("Don't funk with my funk."--Bootsy Collins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yonif
Sounds like greenies trying to spin gun owners against the President.I'm sure the Alaskans appreciates this guy from Utah telling them what to do with their forest.
13 posted on 12/03/2003 3:52:57 PM PST by PolishProud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yonif
This is a scam. NBC News presented a similar scenerio tonight, pretending they were interviewing a hunter(or rancher) from Montana who said, "I have always voted republican but I will not vote for Bush". This is the latest in a long line of organized attacks on President Bush. As usual, the so-called main-stream news media is front and center.

14 posted on 12/03/2003 3:55:07 PM PST by PhilipFreneau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhilipFreneau
bump
15 posted on 12/03/2003 4:06:28 PM PST by yonif ("If I Forget Thee, O Jerusalem, Let My Right Hand Wither" - Psalms 137:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: PhilipFreneau
IF the so-called Assault Weapons Ban gets renewed by Congress (it is scheduled to sunset in September, 2004) and IF President Bush signs it (he has says that he would), you will see quite a few gunowners abandon Bush.

Maybe not the guys who pull out their deer rifle once a year, but the true firearms freedom people will. They are watching this one like a hawk. If you don't believe me, peruse some of the threads on the subject at The High Road. The President needs to watch his step on this issue very, very carefully. Best if he makes sure it never gets to his desk.

16 posted on 12/03/2003 4:12:16 PM PST by GnL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: yonif
I don't know about y'all, but sunset of the Clinton gun ban is imperative for my pro Bush vote.
17 posted on 12/03/2003 4:15:11 PM PST by alaskanfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yonif
I'm not sure I believe this article but Bush is seriously in trouble in Ohio because of RINO Governor Taft. The RINO has managed to alienate a large number of previously faithful Republican Gun owners and the current battle cry is "No CCW in 03, No Bush in 04".Pro second amendment voters are so frustrated they are trying to get pressure put on Taft from the RNC. Bush barely carried Ohio in 2000 and RINO Taft has alienated more voters than Presidebt Bush carried the state by. If President Bush loses Ohio, he loses. If you really want President Bush to win help get control of the RINO.
18 posted on 12/03/2003 4:15:57 PM PST by bota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: yonif
The Republicans quoted here NEVER say anything about Bush that's negative. This article is BARF city.

What kind of fools do they think we are? I don't love the man, but I won't be pushed away from voting for him by idiotic drivel like this.

They should just list the reasons gun owners should vote Democrat. That would be MUCH more convincing:

1) Vote RAT! We promise not to ban guns (cops and crooks will still have them).
2) Vote RAT! We won't stop you from bearing arms (as long as you're a cop or crook--or both).
3) Vote RAT! We'll protect your right to defend yourself (by calling 911 and crossing your fingers).
19 posted on 12/03/2003 4:36:54 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (When laws are regularly flouted, respect of the law and law enforcement diminishes correspondingly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yonif
I found Nelson's quote interesting. How can the NRA have a field director who never heard of Ronald Reagan?
20 posted on 12/03/2003 4:50:13 PM PST by caltrop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson