Skip to comments.
U.S. Programmers at Overseas Salaries
Businessweek ^
| 12/03/03
| David E. Gumpert
Posted on 12/03/2003 11:17:18 AM PST by Pikamax
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-165 next last
To: Pikachu_Dad
You are always free to hold-out for that $80,000 programming job. But you should probably get out of the way of people who can get the job done for less, as anyone who has ever worked in sales or marketing can attest.
41
posted on
12/03/2003 12:37:11 PM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: Alouette
Um, if you are out of work your not making any money or you might be getting unemployment. Doubt it is more that $45k/year. Either way, that is not less money so there is no lower standard of living. Even if the ones that were hired had jobs, I'd be willing to bet that the $45k was a raise in income, so they probably raised their standard of living.
42
posted on
12/03/2003 12:38:41 PM PST
by
looscnnn
("Live free or die; death is not the worst of evils" Gen. John Stark 1809)
To: ThinkDifferent
Yes, lower salaries hurt developers (of which I am one), but they benefit everyone else. In short term yes. But in the long term no. Imagine if the physicians are paid 25K per year. This will be a tremendous "benefit" for "everyone else". But nobody will study medicine, most of good physicians will look for other jobs and the only new ones will be the Third World immigrants with fake diplomas. Cutting wages is not the best way to develop the country.
43
posted on
12/03/2003 12:39:26 PM PST
by
A. Pole
(pay no attention to the man behind the curtain , the hand of free market must be invisible)
To: A. Pole
In the longer term, no. If no one studies medicine, then salaries will rise until the demand for physicians is met.
44
posted on
12/03/2003 12:42:22 PM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: A. Pole
But nobody will study medicine, most of good physicians will look for other jobs
And as an added bonus: everyone's going to law school these days. So while everyone's cheering that wages are going down, be prepared for a lot more class action lawsuits as people are trying to make a quick buck.
Odd how when you make an honest living unprofitable people start to go to shader ones.
45
posted on
12/03/2003 12:43:48 PM PST
by
lelio
To: Alouette
Because these people are making less money and therefore have to adjust to a lower standard of living?
You are correct, but the other side is using the same logic that says a slowing in the rate of spending growth is actually a budget cut.
46
posted on
12/03/2003 12:47:14 PM PST
by
Arkinsaw
(What LSU game? Huh? No idea what you are talking about.)
To: A. Pole
Cutting wages is not the best way to develop the country. In other words, you get what you pay for. Pay burger flipper wages for programming, and you'll get fast food quality applications.
47
posted on
12/03/2003 12:47:27 PM PST
by
Jim Cane
To: 1rudeboy
"You are always free to hold-out for that $80,000 programming job. But you should probably get out of the way of people who can get the job done for less, as anyone who has ever worked in sales or marketing can attest."
Yup! I toyed with the idea of hiring a couple of programmers for my shareware business and taking it into the commercial software arena. I advertised and got tons of applications, at the going rate at the time. After narrowing down the applications, I had four of what seemed to be the best applicants come in for interviews and a test.
The test was simple: I designed a very simple application specification (one that I completed myself in less than two hours) and had each of the four do the job as a test. The best time I got from any of them was 6 hours, and the app was full of bugs.
Bottom line was that the best four of the applicants I interviewed and tested were crappy programmers. None could type worth a darn and spent most of their time fixing typos in the code. None had any creativity in creating this simple test application. I examined the code each had produced and it was the sloppiest nonsense I had ever seen.
I abandoned my plans at that point and continued on doing all my own coding and kept the software as shareware.
I wouldn't have paid any of the four more than $20K a year, based on what I found. Worse, I would have had to spend almost as much time checking their output as I normally spent coding the apps myself. Feh!
48
posted on
12/03/2003 12:50:46 PM PST
by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
To: lelio
Actually, a few lawsuits and skilled physicians will be in greater demand . . . contradicting your hypothesis.
49
posted on
12/03/2003 12:54:32 PM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: Pikamax
But the problem isn't just salaries, it is attitude. Attitude on the part of business managers who are hostile to techies.
To: 1rudeboy
Our engineering shop has only 12 or so engineers and we produce a product(s) that competes head on (and wins) with our competitors who have hundreds of engineers producing a similair solution. We only have one engineering manager and I suspect our competitors have 10 times that number at a minimum. It's the old saying "quality over quantity".
The problem isn't tech talent the problem is bad management. If there are any "managers" out there I would be happy to school you in productive product development, for a fee of course :-)
To: William McKinley
They are making less money than they are when they have no job? LOL, things that make you go "Hmmmm".
I agree, it beats being out of work.
To: A. Pole
fake diplomas
ROFLMBO !
OMG ! I wasted 10 years of my life at College and University !
53
posted on
12/03/2003 1:06:00 PM PST
by
pyx
(Is this really all there is ?)
To: 1rudeboy
Actually, a few lawsuits and skilled physicians will be in greater demand . . . contradicting your hypothesis.
I take it you mean that the few lawyers that win big in class action lawsuits will be able to afford expensive doctors, thus everything will even itself out?
The problem with that way of thinking is that:
a) a lot of lawyers are just hucksters that feed off the system and don't create wealth
b) you now have a lot more lawsuits flying around, inhibiting economic growth
c) one person only need so much medical care. If one attorney gets $10M he's still only going to need one doctor, whereas if 100 people had $100k each they'll need several
54
posted on
12/03/2003 1:09:37 PM PST
by
lelio
To: RockyMtnMan
Perhaps I wasn't clear. I used to rep a steel building product that was consistently the most expensive on the market, when compared to substitutes. I sold on quality (tolerances) and delivery (to the hour). My clients would whine about my prices every day. Whatever.
All you programmers out there; here's a hint. Sell at the market price, or differentiate your "product." Giddee-yup.
55
posted on
12/03/2003 1:12:20 PM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: Orangedog
"Come, spend a small fortune in tuition and years of your life so you can earn what they pay people in countries like India!" The school debt cannot be discharged through bankruptcy so not only you will be doomed to poverty but you will be harassed by the debt collectors to the end of your life.
56
posted on
12/03/2003 1:16:03 PM PST
by
A. Pole
(pay no attention to the man behind the curtain , the hand of free market must be invisible)
To: lelio
Are you being deliberately obtuse? What about the hospitals, HMO's, insurance co.'s, pharmaceutical co.'s, medical-device co.'s,
etc? They get sued also. You don't think that creates an incentive to hire/retain quality physicians?
I take it you mean that the few lawyers that win big in class action lawsuits will be able to afford expensive doctors . . . .
[laughter]
57
posted on
12/03/2003 1:16:30 PM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: Pikamax
Clearly, American programmers just want to work, but idiot MBAs still insist on exporting our economy.
58
posted on
12/03/2003 1:16:43 PM PST
by
sixmil
To: A. Pole
This makes sense to me. CS majors, especially technical programmer types, enjoyed inflated salaries from the 90s "new economy" boom that went bust. There was little doubt there would be a correction. My concern was there would be an overcorrection as a result of "technician dumping" from temporary visa programs and "outsourcing."
To: Pikamax
So last spring, when cMarket signed an agreement with the national Parent Teachers Assn. [PTA] to handle online auctions for its 20,000-plus local chapters and, simultaneously, began taking on charity auctions from Boston to Miami, Jon knew he had to rapidly expand cMarket's capabilities. The cMarket web site says that Jon "has previously served on the boards of the National PTA", and elsewhere the cMarket web site contains an endorsement from Pam Grotz, Executive Director saying "We think the cMarket platform is a great step forward for the thousands of our local units who run auctions and are excited about its potential to spread best practices throughout the PTA network." These people give me the creeps.
60
posted on
12/03/2003 1:19:15 PM PST
by
dano1
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-165 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson