Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tijeras_Slim
The take I heard was that in Egypt during WWI the commander of British troops was taken aback by the disparaging language used towards the local troops and suggested that they be referred to as "Worthy Oriental Gentlemen". Like all good soldiers the Brits reduced it to the acronym, as brevity is the soul of wit.

Just so. I've also heard *Wily Oriental Gents* used as the three words so abbreviated, particularly in reference to past experiences in India or [now] Pakistani territory under British control. I've probably heard it from Nepalese Gurkhas as much as from anyone, who might be expected to take offense upon hearing themselves so referred if they thought it perjorative; but I can't recall such an example in my experience. Bored Gurkhas looking for an excuse for a little dust-up might pretend offense, I suppose, but that hardly seems worth a broad-spectrum condemnation.

Too, I can imagine the domestic use might be harsher in industrial towns of the British Isles facing wholesale Paki immigration as opposed to out in the field with the troops. Of course those who routinely ply their trade with automatic weaponry are often more curiously formal and polite than their less-capable fellows. Heinlein was right: an armed society really is a more polite one.

-archy-/-

79 posted on 12/04/2003 9:06:57 AM PST by archy (Angiloj! Mia kusenveturilo estas plena da angiloj!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: archy
I don't believe I would insult a Gurkha, I have a liking for the way me head is attached.
89 posted on 12/04/2003 10:40:12 AM PST by Tijeras_Slim (SSDD - Same S#it Different Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson