Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mhking
I saw the video. He needs to go up under the jail

To watch this video - this is not itself crime in America? To possess image of sex with child?

7 posted on 12/02/2003 7:55:30 PM PST by Alter Kaker (Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Alter Kaker
To watch this video - this is not itself crime in America?

Possession of the video could be construed as possession of child pornography.

18 posted on 12/02/2003 8:11:16 PM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Alter Kaker
To watch this video - this is not itself crime in America? To possess image of sex with child?

Yes, but its wide distribution on the internet means that a lot of people have it, or had it at one point and have since gotten rid of it. When the prosecutors charged Kelly, they specifically said that possession of the video is a crime, and that probably spooked a lot of people into deleting it.
55 posted on 12/02/2003 9:37:41 PM PST by July 4th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson