To: bethelgrad
I was just thinking...Dean reminds me, in an odd way, of course, of Pat Buchanan in 2000. Hear me out before you all flame me...In 2000 Pat ran in the Reform party and basically finished it off as a force to be reckoned with. ( I wouldn't be surprised if that wasn't his intention the whole time either) In 2004 Dean may win the Democrat nomination and if he keeps up these loony proclamations then we may be seeing the end of Dems as a viable political party. Of course something will rise to fill the vacuum, maybe the Libertarians, who knows!
15 posted on
12/02/2003 6:07:24 PM PST by
Preech1
(Montezuma has once again sought his revenge...It goes by the name of "Chi-Chi's"...)
To: Preech1
Maybe Dean is just setting up the Dim party for a fall,
knowing GWB is going to be elected this time no matter what and is going to bow out at the last minute to suck hillery! into running(bad vision I know but bear with me) and then run in 08.
53 posted on
12/02/2003 6:27:37 PM PST by
tet68
To: Preech1
Interesting theory on purposeful demo implosion.
It's not necessary that a third party replace the Demo party. The Democrats can reform their own party from within, but first must scrape the Clinton regime off it's shoes. We'll see if they have the brains, and the guts, to do the right thing.
If not, look for the democrat party to shrink to a pathetic angry minority of screeching malcontents.
Uh, wait, that's already happening.
87 posted on
12/02/2003 7:29:11 PM PST by
moodyskeptic
(weekend warrior in the culture war)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson