Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jack Wilson
He also owes for violations at his house. He must be a real... flagrant fellow. I think he has a right to do on his property what he will, but then I believing in zoning laws, too. Point being, it wouldn't be worth it to me.
6 posted on 12/02/2003 6:50:24 PM PST by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: farmfriend
ping
7 posted on 12/02/2003 6:57:25 PM PST by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: gcruse
I think basing his legal argument on freedom of religion is a loser. Santa is a pretty secular fella.

But he could win if he phrased the argument differently. There is no rational basis for restricting Santa to two months, any more than restricting the Golden Arches for two months.

The guy has a lousy attorney.

10 posted on 12/02/2003 7:35:58 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: gcruse
You can't believe in property rights and zoning both.
18 posted on 12/02/2003 8:26:55 PM PST by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson