[robertpaulsen]

Au contraire, illiterate poster.

The report says that the second amendment does indeed only apply to Congress (as determined by no less than three USSC rulings) -- just that the author feels that it shouldn't.

Hmm. Sounds just like your pathetic argument.

[eno_]

Oh, and I'll repeat my question: ARE you on the Drug War gravy train? Are you one of the people who should be viewed best through sights, and should live their lives in fear of those sights on their back at every corner?

[Dead Corpse]

The report says that the second amendment does indeed only apply to Congress (as determined by no less than three USSC rulings) -- just that the author feels that it shouldn't.

You lying little asshole.

The conclusion is thus inescapable that the history, concept, and wording of the second amendment to the Constitution of the United States, as well as its interpretation by every major commentator and court in the first half century after its ratification, indicates that what is protected is an individual right of a private citizen to own and carry firearms in a peaceful manner.

Pathetic? Conversing with you is a lot like removing the cowflop from the bottom of my boots.