I think something is mighty fishy about these hospice connections. If there is no money being made (by judges) through hospice or health care investments, which is clearly a conflict of interest, there might be at the very least, through their former positions on hospice boards, and associates serving on hospice boards, a pre-disposition to favor killing a disabled person when the law clearly states that it is better to err on the side of life.
Lack of clear evidence that Terri ever wished to die if she became disabled, and the retroactively applied law change making feeding tubes "artificial life support" add to the ICK factor in the rulings handed down from the Pinellas County Circus Court.